Skip to content

How LiteLLM’s scores are calculated

The full audit trail, recomputed from the verdict data at build time through the same code that produced the leaderboard: verdict × quality × story weight per cell, cells sum to dimension scores, dimensions blend into the PA Score. Every number on the product page is reproducible from this page alone; for why the formula looks like this, see the methodology.

verdict factors: full ×1.0 · partial ×0.6 · disputed ×0.3 · none ×0.0 · n/a excluded from both sides · cell points = weight × quality × factor · cell max = weight × 10

PA Score34/100

Agent-ready 61.1 × 0.30 = 18.33

API quality 0.0 × 0.20 = 0.00

Openness 39.0 × 0.20 = 7.80

Built-in AI n/a — excluded, its ×0.15 weight renormalized away

Automation 18.0 × 0.15 = 2.70

(18.33 + 0.00 + 7.80 + 2.70) ÷ (0.30 + 0.20 + 0.20 + 0.15) = 28.83 ÷ 0.85 = 33.9 — weights renormalized over the scored components

Scores are stored to 1 decimal; the product page’s pills round to whole numbers for display. Each dimension below shows the stories, verdicts, and cited evidence behind its number.

Agent-ready61.1/100×0.30 of the PA blend

Outside-in: can YOUR agent reach and drive this product — API, MCP, CLI, headless runs, agent docs.

Point an agent at llms.txt or agent-oriented docsweight 2

2 (weight) × 8 (quality) × 1.0 (full) = 16.0 of 20 max

  • [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/llms.txtPROBE llms.txt: HTTP 200 at https://docs.litellm.ai/llms.txt # https://docs.litellm.ai/ llms.txt - [LiteLLM Overview](https://docs.litellm.ai/): Access and manage 100+ LLMs with Li
  • [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/.mdPROBE docs-md: HTTP 404 at https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/.md

Run the product headlessly / in CI for automationweight 2

2 (weight) × 6 (quality) × 0.6 (partial) = 7.2 of 20 max

  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cliThe number of worker processes to spin up (uvicorn, gunicorn, or Granian --workers).
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cliThe number of worker processes to spin up (uvicorn, gunicorn, or Granian `--workers`).
  • [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cliofficial CLI documented at https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cli
  • [community] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47501426A user described running LiteLLM as a proxy in their homelab via the litellm/litellm docker image for local LLM gateway management, noting they were on an unaffected older version (1.77).
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/Self-hosted LLM Gateway (Proxy) with virtual keys, cost tracking, and an admin UI

Plug MCP servers into this product so it can use their toolsweight 3

3 (weight) × 8 (quality) × 1.0 (full) = 24.0 of 30 max

  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/mcpLiteLLM Proxy provides an MCP Gateway that allows you to use a fixed endpoint for all MCP tools and control MCP access by Key, Team.
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/mcpOn the LiteLLM UI, Navigate to "MCP Servers" and click "Add New MCP Server".

Connect an agent via an official MCP serverweight 3

3 (weight) × 7 (quality) × 1.0 (full) = 21.0 of 30 max

  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/mcpLiteLLM Proxy provides an MCP Gateway that allows you to use a fixed endpoint for all MCP tools and control MCP access by Key, Team.
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/mcpOn the LiteLLM UI, Navigate to "MCP Servers" and click "Add New MCP Server".

Use an official CLIweight 2

2 (weight) × 6 (quality) × 0.6 (partial) = 7.2 of 20 max

  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cliThe number of worker processes to spin up (uvicorn, gunicorn, or Granian --workers).
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cliThe number of worker processes to spin up (uvicorn, gunicorn, or Granian `--workers`).
  • [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cliofficial CLI documented at https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cli

Drive the product through a documented public APIweight 3

3 (weight) × 7 (quality) × 1.0 (full) = 21.0 of 30 max

  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/Call any provider using the same completion() interface, with no API to re-learn for each one
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/Every response follows the OpenAI Chat Completions format, regardless of provider.
  • [github] https://github.com/BerriAI/litellmDrop-in OpenAI compatibility — swap providers without rewriting your code
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/Call any provider using the same `completion()` interface, with no API to re-learn for each one
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/Consistent output format regardless of which provider or model you use
  • [community] https://hn.algolia.com/api/v1/items/37095542LiteLLM maintainer confirmed proxy supports streaming and function-calling in the same way as the openai-python SDK, and added Ollama integration within hours of user requests for local LLM support.
  • [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/openapi.jsonPROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://docs.litellm.ai/openapi.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/swagger.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/api/openapi.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/.well-known/openapi.json)

Issue scoped/least-privilege API credentials for an agentweight 2

2 (weight) × 8 (quality) × 1.0 (full) = 16.0 of 20 max

  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/virtual_keysTrack Spend, and control model access via virtual keys for the proxy
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/usersPersonal budgets: Create virtual keys without team_id for individual spending limits
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/usersApply a budget across all calls on the proxy... budget_duration: 30d # (str) frequency of reset
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/users"team_alias": "my-new-team_4", ... "rpm_limit": 99
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cost_trackingTrack spend for keys, users, and teams across 100+ LLMs.
  • [community] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47501426'Does anyone know a good alternate project... LiteLLM has been getting worse and trying to get me to upgrade to a paid version. I also had issues with creating tokens for other users etc.'

Build against official SDKsweight 2

2 (weight) × 8 (quality) × 1.0 (full) = 16.0 of 20 max

  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/Call any provider using the same completion() interface, with no API to re-learn for each one
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/Every response follows the OpenAI Chat Completions format, regardless of provider.
  • [github] https://github.com/BerriAI/litellmDrop-in OpenAI compatibility — swap providers without rewriting your code
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/Call any provider using the same `completion()` interface, with no API to re-learn for each one
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/Consistent output format regardless of which provider or model you use
  • [community] https://hn.algolia.com/api/v1/items/37095542LiteLLM maintainer confirmed proxy supports streaming and function-calling in the same way as the openai-python SDK, and added Ollama integration within hours of user requests for local LLM support.
  • [community] https://hn.algolia.com/api/v1/items/36887711Show HN launch of the original LiteLLM library; a user praised it: 'This is amazing. Really needed something like this to standardize all my different AI APIs! ... I love how quickly your team is shipping!'

Subscribe to events via webhooksweight 2

2 (weight) × 0 (quality) × 0.0 (none) = 0.0 of 20 max

no evidence cited — the verdict rests on absence of evidence, re-checked on refresh

Agent-ready = 128.4 ÷ 210 × 100 = 61.1

API quality0.0/100×0.20 of the PA blend

The programmable surface once an agent is there — machine-readable spec, interactive docs, sandbox, versioning discipline.

Explore an interactive API reference with runnable examplesweight 2

2 (weight) × 0 (quality) × 0.0 (none) = 0.0 of 20 max

  • [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/openapi.jsonPROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://docs.litellm.ai/openapi.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/swagger.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/api/openapi.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/.well-known/openapi.json)
  • [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/.mdPROBE docs-md: HTTP 404 at https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/.md
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/Call any provider using the same completion() interface, with no API to re-learn for each one
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/Call any provider using the same `completion()` interface, with no API to re-learn for each one

Download a machine-readable API spec (OpenAPI or equivalent)weight 2

2 (weight) × 0 (quality) × 0.0 (none) = 0.0 of 20 max

  • [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/openapi.jsonPROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://docs.litellm.ai/openapi.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/swagger.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/api/openapi.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/.well-known/openapi.json)
  • [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/.mdPROBE docs-md: HTTP 404 at https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/.md

Test against a sandbox environment without touching production dataweight 1

1 (weight) × 0 (quality) × 0.0 (none) = 0.0 of 10 max

no evidence cited — the verdict rests on absence of evidence, re-checked on refresh

Rely on versioned APIs with a documented deprecation policyweight 2

2 (weight) × 0 (quality) × 0.0 (none) = 0.0 of 20 max

  • [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/openapi.jsonPROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://docs.litellm.ai/openapi.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/swagger.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/api/openapi.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/.well-known/openapi.json)
  • [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/.mdPROBE docs-md: HTTP 404 at https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/.md

API quality = 0.0 ÷ 70 × 100 = 0.0

Openness39.0/100×0.20 of the PA blend

Can you leave, inspect, or self-host — data export, open source, portability.

Do everything through the API that I can do in the UIweight 2

2 (weight) × 6 (quality) × 0.6 (partial) = 7.2 of 20 max

  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/Self-hosted LLM Gateway (Proxy) with virtual keys, cost tracking, and an admin UI
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/virtual_keysTrack Spend, and control model access via virtual keys for the proxy
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/mcpLiteLLM Proxy provides an MCP Gateway that allows you to use a fixed endpoint for all MCP tools and control MCP access by Key, Team.
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/mcpOn the LiteLLM UI, Navigate to "MCP Servers" and click "Add New MCP Server".
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cliThe number of worker processes to spin up (uvicorn, gunicorn, or Granian --workers).
  • [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/openapi.jsonPROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://docs.litellm.ai/openapi.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/swagger.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/api/openapi.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/.well-known/openapi.json)
  • [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cliofficial CLI documented at https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cli

Export all of my data in open formats and leaveweight 3

3 (weight) × 0 (quality) × 0.0 (none) = 0.0 of 30 max

  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/Self-hosted LLM Gateway (Proxy) with virtual keys, cost tracking, and an admin UI
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cost_trackingTrack spend for keys, users, and teams across 100+ LLMs.
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/loggingLog Proxy input, output, and exceptions using: Langfuse, OpenTelemetry, GCS, s3, Azure (Blob) Buckets...

Read the product's source under an open licenseweight 2

2 (weight) × 4 (quality) × 0.6 (partial) = 4.8 of 20 max

  • [github] https://github.com/BerriAI/litellmDrop-in OpenAI compatibility — swap providers without rewriting your code
  • [community] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47501426The GitHub account of LiteLLM's Founder/CTO (krrishdholakia) appears to have been fully compromised, with public repos vandalized to say 'teampcp owns BerriAI.'

Self-host the core productweight 3

3 (weight) × 9 (quality) × 1.0 (full) = 27.0 of 30 max

  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/Self-hosted LLM Gateway (Proxy) with virtual keys, cost tracking, and an admin UI
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/Self-hosted [LLM Gateway (Proxy)](/docs/simple_proxy) with virtual keys, cost tracking, and an admin UI
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cliThe number of worker processes to spin up (uvicorn, gunicorn, or Granian --workers).
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cliThe number of worker processes to spin up (uvicorn, gunicorn, or Granian `--workers`).
  • [community] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47501426A user described running LiteLLM as a proxy in their homelab via the litellm/litellm docker image for local LLM gateway management, noting they were on an unaffected older version (1.77).
  • [community] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47501426'That's a bad supply-chain attack, many folks use litellm as main gateway' — reflecting how widely used LiteLLM is as an LLM gateway.

Openness = 39.0 ÷ 100 × 100 = 39.0

Built-in AIn/a×0.15 of the PA blend

Inside-out: how agentic the product itself is for its users — built-in assistants, autonomous features.

Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the productweight 2

n/a — not applicable to this product: excluded from numerator and denominator

no evidence cited — the verdict rests on absence of evidence, re-checked on refresh

Set up automations that run autonomously in the backgroundweight 2

n/a — not applicable to this product: excluded from numerator and denominator

no evidence cited — the verdict rests on absence of evidence, re-checked on refresh

Delegate tasks to a built-in AI assistant inside the productweight 3

n/a — not applicable to this product: excluded from numerator and denominator

no evidence cited — the verdict rests on absence of evidence, re-checked on refresh

Operate the product with natural-language commandsweight 2

n/a — not applicable to this product: excluded from numerator and denominator

no evidence cited — the verdict rests on absence of evidence, re-checked on refresh

every cell n/a — unscored (not zero), excluded from the blend

Automation18.0/100×0.15 of the PA blend

Depth of automation primitives — rules, scheduling, bulk operations, webhooks.

Perform bulk operations across many items at onceweight 2

2 (weight) × 0 (quality) × 0.0 (none) = 0.0 of 20 max

no evidence cited — the verdict rests on absence of evidence, re-checked on refresh

Define rules that trigger actions automatically on eventsweight 3

3 (weight) × 5 (quality) × 0.6 (partial) = 9.0 of 30 max

  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/reliabilityIf a call fails after num_retries, LiteLLM falls back to another model group, so a failing model or provider automatically fails over to a healthy backup.
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/reliabilitycontent_policy_fallbacks: For litellm.ContentPolicyViolationError - LiteLLM maps content policy violation errors across providers
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/reliabilityso a failing model or provider automatically fails over to a healthy backup
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/reliabilityThe request to `model="zephyr-beta"` will fail... litellm proxy will loop through all the model_groups specified in `fallbacks=["gpt-3.5-turbo"]`
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/usersApply a budget across all calls on the proxy... budget_duration: 30d # (str) frequency of reset
  • [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/users"team_alias": "my-new-team_4", ... "rpm_limit": 99

Schedule recurring jobs or workflowsweight 2

n/a — not applicable to this product: excluded from numerator and denominator

no evidence cited — the verdict rests on absence of evidence, re-checked on refresh

Version, review, and roll back my automationsweight 1

n/a — not applicable to this product: excluded from numerator and denominator

no evidence cited — the verdict rests on absence of evidence, re-checked on refresh

Automation = 9.0 ÷ 50 × 100 = 18.0