How LiteLLM’s scores are calculated
The full audit trail, recomputed from the verdict data at build time through the same code that produced the leaderboard: verdict × quality × story weight per cell, cells sum to dimension scores, dimensions blend into the PA Score. Every number on the product page is reproducible from this page alone; for why the formula looks like this, see the methodology.
verdict factors: full ×1.0 · partial ×0.6 · disputed ×0.3 · none ×0.0 · n/a excluded from both sides · cell points = weight × quality × factor · cell max = weight × 10
PA Score34/100
Agent-ready 61.1 × 0.30 = 18.33
API quality 0.0 × 0.20 = 0.00
Openness 39.0 × 0.20 = 7.80
Built-in AI n/a — excluded, its ×0.15 weight renormalized away
Automation 18.0 × 0.15 = 2.70
(18.33 + 0.00 + 7.80 + 2.70) ÷ (0.30 + 0.20 + 0.20 + 0.15) = 28.83 ÷ 0.85 = 33.9 — weights renormalized over the scored components
Scores are stored to 1 decimal; the product page’s pills round to whole numbers for display. Each dimension below shows the stories, verdicts, and cited evidence behind its number.
Agent-ready61.1/100×0.30 of the PA blend
Outside-in: can YOUR agent reach and drive this product — API, MCP, CLI, headless runs, agent docs.
Point an agent at llms.txt or agent-oriented docsweight 2
2 (weight) × 8 (quality) × 1.0 (full) = 16.0 of 20 max
- [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/llms.txt“PROBE llms.txt: HTTP 200 at https://docs.litellm.ai/llms.txt # https://docs.litellm.ai/ llms.txt - [LiteLLM Overview](https://docs.litellm.ai/): Access and manage 100+ LLMs with Li”
- [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/.md“PROBE docs-md: HTTP 404 at https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/.md”
Run the product headlessly / in CI for automationweight 2
2 (weight) × 6 (quality) × 0.6 (partial) = 7.2 of 20 max
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cli“The number of worker processes to spin up (uvicorn, gunicorn, or Granian --workers).”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cli“The number of worker processes to spin up (uvicorn, gunicorn, or Granian `--workers`).”
- [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cli“official CLI documented at https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cli”
- [community] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47501426“A user described running LiteLLM as a proxy in their homelab via the litellm/litellm docker image for local LLM gateway management, noting they were on an unaffected older version (1.77).”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/“Self-hosted LLM Gateway (Proxy) with virtual keys, cost tracking, and an admin UI”
Plug MCP servers into this product so it can use their toolsweight 3
3 (weight) × 8 (quality) × 1.0 (full) = 24.0 of 30 max
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/mcp“LiteLLM Proxy provides an MCP Gateway that allows you to use a fixed endpoint for all MCP tools and control MCP access by Key, Team.”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/mcp“On the LiteLLM UI, Navigate to "MCP Servers" and click "Add New MCP Server".”
Connect an agent via an official MCP serverweight 3
3 (weight) × 7 (quality) × 1.0 (full) = 21.0 of 30 max
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/mcp“LiteLLM Proxy provides an MCP Gateway that allows you to use a fixed endpoint for all MCP tools and control MCP access by Key, Team.”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/mcp“On the LiteLLM UI, Navigate to "MCP Servers" and click "Add New MCP Server".”
Use an official CLIweight 2
2 (weight) × 6 (quality) × 0.6 (partial) = 7.2 of 20 max
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cli“The number of worker processes to spin up (uvicorn, gunicorn, or Granian --workers).”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cli“The number of worker processes to spin up (uvicorn, gunicorn, or Granian `--workers`).”
- [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cli“official CLI documented at https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cli”
Drive the product through a documented public APIweight 3
3 (weight) × 7 (quality) × 1.0 (full) = 21.0 of 30 max
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/“Call any provider using the same completion() interface, with no API to re-learn for each one”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/“Every response follows the OpenAI Chat Completions format, regardless of provider.”
- [github] https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm“Drop-in OpenAI compatibility — swap providers without rewriting your code”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/“Call any provider using the same `completion()` interface, with no API to re-learn for each one”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/“Consistent output format regardless of which provider or model you use”
- [community] https://hn.algolia.com/api/v1/items/37095542“LiteLLM maintainer confirmed proxy supports streaming and function-calling in the same way as the openai-python SDK, and added Ollama integration within hours of user requests for local LLM support.”
- [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/openapi.json“PROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://docs.litellm.ai/openapi.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/swagger.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/api/openapi.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/.well-known/openapi.json)”
Issue scoped/least-privilege API credentials for an agentweight 2
2 (weight) × 8 (quality) × 1.0 (full) = 16.0 of 20 max
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/virtual_keys“Track Spend, and control model access via virtual keys for the proxy”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/users“Personal budgets: Create virtual keys without team_id for individual spending limits”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/users“Apply a budget across all calls on the proxy... budget_duration: 30d # (str) frequency of reset”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/users“"team_alias": "my-new-team_4", ... "rpm_limit": 99”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cost_tracking“Track spend for keys, users, and teams across 100+ LLMs.”
- [community] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47501426“'Does anyone know a good alternate project... LiteLLM has been getting worse and trying to get me to upgrade to a paid version. I also had issues with creating tokens for other users etc.'”
Build against official SDKsweight 2
2 (weight) × 8 (quality) × 1.0 (full) = 16.0 of 20 max
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/“Call any provider using the same completion() interface, with no API to re-learn for each one”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/“Every response follows the OpenAI Chat Completions format, regardless of provider.”
- [github] https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm“Drop-in OpenAI compatibility — swap providers without rewriting your code”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/“Call any provider using the same `completion()` interface, with no API to re-learn for each one”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/“Consistent output format regardless of which provider or model you use”
- [community] https://hn.algolia.com/api/v1/items/37095542“LiteLLM maintainer confirmed proxy supports streaming and function-calling in the same way as the openai-python SDK, and added Ollama integration within hours of user requests for local LLM support.”
- [community] https://hn.algolia.com/api/v1/items/36887711“Show HN launch of the original LiteLLM library; a user praised it: 'This is amazing. Really needed something like this to standardize all my different AI APIs! ... I love how quickly your team is shipping!'”
Subscribe to events via webhooksweight 2
2 (weight) × 0 (quality) × 0.0 (none) = 0.0 of 20 max
no evidence cited — the verdict rests on absence of evidence, re-checked on refresh
Agent-ready = 128.4 ÷ 210 × 100 = 61.1
API quality0.0/100×0.20 of the PA blend
The programmable surface once an agent is there — machine-readable spec, interactive docs, sandbox, versioning discipline.
Explore an interactive API reference with runnable examplesweight 2
2 (weight) × 0 (quality) × 0.0 (none) = 0.0 of 20 max
- [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/openapi.json“PROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://docs.litellm.ai/openapi.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/swagger.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/api/openapi.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/.well-known/openapi.json)”
- [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/.md“PROBE docs-md: HTTP 404 at https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/.md”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/“Call any provider using the same completion() interface, with no API to re-learn for each one”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/“Call any provider using the same `completion()` interface, with no API to re-learn for each one”
Download a machine-readable API spec (OpenAPI or equivalent)weight 2
2 (weight) × 0 (quality) × 0.0 (none) = 0.0 of 20 max
- [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/openapi.json“PROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://docs.litellm.ai/openapi.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/swagger.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/api/openapi.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/.well-known/openapi.json)”
- [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/.md“PROBE docs-md: HTTP 404 at https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/.md”
Test against a sandbox environment without touching production dataweight 1
1 (weight) × 0 (quality) × 0.0 (none) = 0.0 of 10 max
no evidence cited — the verdict rests on absence of evidence, re-checked on refresh
Rely on versioned APIs with a documented deprecation policyweight 2
2 (weight) × 0 (quality) × 0.0 (none) = 0.0 of 20 max
- [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/openapi.json“PROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://docs.litellm.ai/openapi.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/swagger.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/api/openapi.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/.well-known/openapi.json)”
- [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/.md“PROBE docs-md: HTTP 404 at https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/.md”
API quality = 0.0 ÷ 70 × 100 = 0.0
Openness39.0/100×0.20 of the PA blend
Can you leave, inspect, or self-host — data export, open source, portability.
Do everything through the API that I can do in the UIweight 2
2 (weight) × 6 (quality) × 0.6 (partial) = 7.2 of 20 max
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/“Self-hosted LLM Gateway (Proxy) with virtual keys, cost tracking, and an admin UI”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/virtual_keys“Track Spend, and control model access via virtual keys for the proxy”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/mcp“LiteLLM Proxy provides an MCP Gateway that allows you to use a fixed endpoint for all MCP tools and control MCP access by Key, Team.”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/mcp“On the LiteLLM UI, Navigate to "MCP Servers" and click "Add New MCP Server".”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cli“The number of worker processes to spin up (uvicorn, gunicorn, or Granian --workers).”
- [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/openapi.json“PROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://docs.litellm.ai/openapi.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/swagger.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/api/openapi.json, https://docs.litellm.ai/.well-known/openapi.json)”
- [probe] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cli“official CLI documented at https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cli”
Export all of my data in open formats and leaveweight 3
3 (weight) × 0 (quality) × 0.0 (none) = 0.0 of 30 max
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/“Self-hosted LLM Gateway (Proxy) with virtual keys, cost tracking, and an admin UI”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cost_tracking“Track spend for keys, users, and teams across 100+ LLMs.”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/logging“Log Proxy input, output, and exceptions using: Langfuse, OpenTelemetry, GCS, s3, Azure (Blob) Buckets...”
Read the product's source under an open licenseweight 2
2 (weight) × 4 (quality) × 0.6 (partial) = 4.8 of 20 max
- [github] https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm“Drop-in OpenAI compatibility — swap providers without rewriting your code”
- [community] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47501426“The GitHub account of LiteLLM's Founder/CTO (krrishdholakia) appears to have been fully compromised, with public repos vandalized to say 'teampcp owns BerriAI.'”
Self-host the core productweight 3
3 (weight) × 9 (quality) × 1.0 (full) = 27.0 of 30 max
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/“Self-hosted LLM Gateway (Proxy) with virtual keys, cost tracking, and an admin UI”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/“Self-hosted [LLM Gateway (Proxy)](/docs/simple_proxy) with virtual keys, cost tracking, and an admin UI”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cli“The number of worker processes to spin up (uvicorn, gunicorn, or Granian --workers).”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/cli“The number of worker processes to spin up (uvicorn, gunicorn, or Granian `--workers`).”
- [community] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47501426“A user described running LiteLLM as a proxy in their homelab via the litellm/litellm docker image for local LLM gateway management, noting they were on an unaffected older version (1.77).”
- [community] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47501426“'That's a bad supply-chain attack, many folks use litellm as main gateway' — reflecting how widely used LiteLLM is as an LLM gateway.”
Openness = 39.0 ÷ 100 × 100 = 39.0
Built-in AIn/a×0.15 of the PA blend
Inside-out: how agentic the product itself is for its users — built-in assistants, autonomous features.
Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the productweight 2
n/a — not applicable to this product: excluded from numerator and denominator
no evidence cited — the verdict rests on absence of evidence, re-checked on refresh
Set up automations that run autonomously in the backgroundweight 2
n/a — not applicable to this product: excluded from numerator and denominator
no evidence cited — the verdict rests on absence of evidence, re-checked on refresh
Delegate tasks to a built-in AI assistant inside the productweight 3
n/a — not applicable to this product: excluded from numerator and denominator
no evidence cited — the verdict rests on absence of evidence, re-checked on refresh
Operate the product with natural-language commandsweight 2
n/a — not applicable to this product: excluded from numerator and denominator
no evidence cited — the verdict rests on absence of evidence, re-checked on refresh
every cell n/a — unscored (not zero), excluded from the blend
Automation18.0/100×0.15 of the PA blend
Depth of automation primitives — rules, scheduling, bulk operations, webhooks.
Perform bulk operations across many items at onceweight 2
2 (weight) × 0 (quality) × 0.0 (none) = 0.0 of 20 max
no evidence cited — the verdict rests on absence of evidence, re-checked on refresh
Define rules that trigger actions automatically on eventsweight 3
3 (weight) × 5 (quality) × 0.6 (partial) = 9.0 of 30 max
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/reliability“If a call fails after num_retries, LiteLLM falls back to another model group, so a failing model or provider automatically fails over to a healthy backup.”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/reliability“content_policy_fallbacks: For litellm.ContentPolicyViolationError - LiteLLM maps content policy violation errors across providers”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/reliability“so a failing model or provider automatically fails over to a healthy backup”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/reliability“The request to `model="zephyr-beta"` will fail... litellm proxy will loop through all the model_groups specified in `fallbacks=["gpt-3.5-turbo"]`”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/users“Apply a budget across all calls on the proxy... budget_duration: 30d # (str) frequency of reset”
- [claimed-docs] https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/users“"team_alias": "my-new-team_4", ... "rpm_limit": 99”
Schedule recurring jobs or workflowsweight 2
n/a — not applicable to this product: excluded from numerator and denominator
no evidence cited — the verdict rests on absence of evidence, re-checked on refresh
Version, review, and roll back my automationsweight 1
n/a — not applicable to this product: excluded from numerator and denominator
no evidence cited — the verdict rests on absence of evidence, re-checked on refresh
Automation = 9.0 ÷ 50 × 100 = 18.0