Motion vs SavvyCal

Agent ops

1. ai-native userMy agent can check availability, book, reschedule, and cancel meetings end to end through the API or MCP — no dashboard needed

   weight 3 · round to SavvyCal
   Motion—none0/10

   Motion's API docs mention creating/updating projects and tasks, but no evidence pack item shows meeting-specific endpoints for checking availability, booking, rescheduling, or canceling meetings via API, nor any MCP server. Meeting scheduling features (daily limits, templates, calendar merging) are described as dashboard/product features, not API-exposed agent actions.

   • [claimed-docs] “API access for creating, updating, and managing projects and tasks.”
   • [claimed-docs] “The API reference has a complete guide on all our endpoints.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Set daily limits and watch Motion enforce them automatically. When you hit your threshold, your calendar becomes unbookable—no more accident…”
   • [claimed-docs] “Build a template for every scenario. Client calls, board meetings, team all hands, sales demos—create a custom template for each with specif…”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal~partialprobed3/10

   SavvyCal has a documented REST API with OAuth/PAT auth and a named 'Meetings API' (savvycal-docs-5,45,50,53,54,61), suggesting programmatic meeting management exists, but there is no evidence of specific endpoints for checking availability, booking, rescheduling, or canceling meetings, and no MCP server is mentioned anywhere. Probes confirm no discoverable OpenAPI spec or llms.txt, undermining agent-readiness. missing for 10: explicit API endpoints/docs for availability check, book, reschedule, cancel; any MCP server or agent-specific integration; independent confirmation of end-to-end API scheduling flow.

   • [claimed-docs] “OAuth 2.0: OAuth2 ... HTTP: Bearer Auth ... Personal access token authentication”
   • [claimed-docs] “Personal access token authentication”
   • [claimed-docs] “OAuth 2.0 authorization code flow ... Personal access token authentication”
   • [claimed-docs] “We offer several ways to integrate with our product, including a REST API, webhooks, and a JavaScript embed library.”
   • [claimed-docs] “OAuth 2.0: OAuth2 ... Personal access token authentication ... Bearer format: pt_secret_XXXXXXXXX”
   • [probe] “PROBE llms.txt: HTTP 404 at https://developers.savvycal.com/llms.txt”
   • [probe] “PROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://developers.savvycal.com/openapi.json, https://developers.savvycal.com/swagger.json, https://…”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

2. ai-native userAgents can use my scheduling account as a tool — an MCP server or tool-calling surface exposes availability, bookings, and event types

   weight 2 · round drawn
   Motion—none0/10

   Motion documents a general REST API for tasks/projects (motion-docs-1, motion-docs-29) but no evidence of an MCP server or agent tool-calling surface exposing availability, bookings, or event types specifically for AI agents. The axis applies since a scheduling SaaS could plausibly ship such an interface, but nothing in the evidence pack shows one exists.

   • [claimed-docs] “API access for creating, updating, and managing projects and tasks.”
   • [claimed-docs] “The API reference has a complete guide on all our endpoints.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Our cookbooks are a great place to get started for fully fleshed out examples!”
   • [claimed-docs] “Explore our guides and examples to integrate Motion.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   SavvyCal offers a REST API, webhooks, and OAuth/PAT auth, but there is no evidence of an MCP server, tool-calling schema, or agent-facing surface; probes for llms.txt and OpenAPI spec both 404, indicating no discoverable machine/agent tool interface.

   • [claimed-docs] “The SavvyCal API adheres to REST conventions. Our API communicates in JSON format and uses OAuth access tokens to authenticate requests.”
   • [claimed-docs] “We offer several ways to integrate with our product, including a REST API, webhooks, and a JavaScript embed library.”
   • [probe] “PROBE llms.txt: HTTP 404 at https://developers.savvycal.com/llms.txt”
   • [probe] “PROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://developers.savvycal.com/openapi.json, https://developers.savvycal.com/swagger.json, https://…”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

Agent access

1. ai-native userPoint an agent at llms.txt or agent-oriented docs

   weight 2 · round to Motion
   Motion~partialclaimed6/10

   Motion has a live llms.txt file (motion-docs-1, motion-docs-34) and API docs/cookbooks (motion-docs-2, motion-docs-28, motion-docs-29) that an agent could be pointed at, showing basic agent-oriented documentation exists. missing for 10: no explicit agent-facing usage guidance beyond the llms.txt stub, no independent/hands-on confirmation an agent successfully used llms.txt to accomplish tasks, and no dedicated 'for AI agents' onboarding docs beyond API reference.

   • [claimed-docs] “API access for creating, updating, and managing projects and tasks.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Usemotion’s AI-powered scheduling, automated prioritization, meeting booking, and workflow automation tailored to each industry’s specific p…”
   • [claimed-docs] “Our cookbooks are a great place to get started for fully fleshed out examples!”
   • [claimed-docs] “Explore our guides and examples to integrate Motion.”
   • [claimed-docs] “The API reference has a complete guide on all our endpoints.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   A direct probe for llms.txt returned a 404, and no evidence indicates any agent-oriented documentation or AI-consumable docs format exists.

   • [probe] “PROBE llms.txt: HTTP 404 at https://developers.savvycal.com/llms.txt”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

2. ai-native userRun the product headlessly / in CI for automation

   weight 2 · round to SavvyCal
   Motion~partialclaimed3/10

   Motion exposes a REST API for creating/managing tasks and projects (docs-1, docs-29) which could technically be scripted for automation, but there is no evidence of a CLI, headless mode, Docker/container support, or CI-specific documentation/examples showing the product running unattended in a pipeline. Missing for 10: CLI or headless execution mode, explicit CI/CD integration guides, and independent evidence of automated/agentic use via the API.

   • [claimed-docs] “API access for creating, updating, and managing projects and tasks.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Explore our guides and examples to integrate Motion.”
   • [claimed-docs] “The API reference has a complete guide on all our endpoints.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal~partialclaimed4/10

   SavvyCal exposes a REST API with OAuth/personal-access-token auth and webhooks (savvycal-docs-1, savvycal-docs-5, savvycal-docs-45) which allows scripted, non-UI automation of scheduling tasks, giving a partial headless-usage path. However there is no CLI, no documented CI/automation runner, and no explicit guidance for unattended CI execution. Missing for 10: a CLI or headless mode, CI-specific documentation/examples, and evidence of unattended/automated execution outside interactive OAuth flows.

   • [claimed-docs] “The SavvyCal API adheres to REST conventions. Our API communicates in JSON format and uses OAuth access tokens to authenticate requests.”
   • [claimed-docs] “OAuth 2.0: OAuth2 ... HTTP: Bearer Auth ... Personal access token authentication”
   • [claimed-docs] “Personal access token authentication”
   • [claimed-docs] “We offer several ways to integrate with our product, including a REST API, webhooks, and a JavaScript embed library.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

3. ai-native userConnect an agent via an official MCP server

   weight 3 · round drawn
   Motion—none0/10

   Motion offers a REST API and Zapier integration, but there is no evidence of an official MCP server or MCP-based agent connectivity anywhere in the evidence pack.

   • [claimed-docs] “API access for creating, updating, and managing projects and tasks.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Explore our guides and examples to integrate Motion.”
   • [claimed-docs] “The API reference has a complete guide on all our endpoints.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Connect with thousands of the most popular apps using Zapier.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   SavvyCal is a scheduling SaaS, so publishing an official MCP server is a fair, applicable question for its ecosystem, but there is no mention of MCP anywhere in the evidence—only REST API, webhooks, and JS embed integrations are documented. missing for 10: any mention of an MCP server, agent integration, or MCP protocol support.

   • [claimed-docs] “We offer several ways to integrate with our product, including a REST API, webhooks, and a JavaScript embed library.”
   • [probe] “PROBE llms.txt: HTTP 404 at https://developers.savvycal.com/llms.txt”
   • [probe] “PROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://developers.savvycal.com/openapi.json, https://developers.savvycal.com/swagger.json, https://…”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

4. ai-native userUse an official CLI

   weight 2 · round drawn
   Motion—none0/10

   Motion documents a REST API and cookbooks (motion-docs-1, motion-docs-2, motion-docs-29) but nowhere mentions an official CLI tool for AI-native workflows; the evidence pack contains no CLI reference at all.

   • [claimed-docs] “API access for creating, updating, and managing projects and tasks.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Our cookbooks are a great place to get started for fully fleshed out examples!”
   • [claimed-docs] “The API reference has a complete guide on all our endpoints.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   SavvyCal offers a REST API, webhooks, and JS embed library, but there is no mention anywhere of an official CLI tool for AI-native workflows.

   • [claimed-docs] “We offer several ways to integrate with our product, including a REST API, webhooks, and a JavaScript embed library.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

5. ai-native userDrive the product through a documented public API

   weight 3 · round drawn
   Motion✓fullclaimed7/10

   Motion publishes a documented public API (docs.usemotion.com/api-reference) with endpoint guides and cookbooks, and llms.txt explicitly states API access for creating/updating/managing projects and tasks, supporting programmatic/agentic use. Missing for 10: independent/hands-on developer corroboration of the API in practice, details on auth/rate limits/SDKs, and evidence of AI agents actually integrating via this API.

   • [claimed-docs] “API access for creating, updating, and managing projects and tasks.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Explore our guides and examples to integrate Motion.”
   • [claimed-docs] “The API reference has a complete guide on all our endpoints.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal✓fullprobed7/10

   SavvyCal documents a public REST API using JSON, OAuth2 and personal access tokens, plus webhooks with HMAC signing and a JS embed library, giving programmatic/agentic control over scheduling. Missing for 10: a discoverable machine-readable OpenAPI spec or llms.txt (probes returned 404) and independent/hands-on corroboration of API completeness.

   • [claimed-docs] “The SavvyCal API adheres to REST conventions. Our API communicates in JSON format and uses OAuth access tokens to authenticate requests.”
   • [claimed-docs] “OAuth 2.0: OAuth2 ... HTTP: Bearer Auth ... Personal access token authentication”
   • [claimed-docs] “Our API communicates in JSON format and uses OAuth access tokens to authenticate requests.”
   • [claimed-docs] “We offer several ways to integrate with our product, including a REST API, webhooks, and a JavaScript embed library.”
   • [claimed-docs] “OAuth 2.0: OAuth2 ... Personal access token authentication ... Bearer format: pt_secret_XXXXXXXXX”
   • [probe] “PROBE llms.txt: HTTP 404 at https://developers.savvycal.com/llms.txt”
   • [probe] “PROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://developers.savvycal.com/openapi.json, https://developers.savvycal.com/swagger.json, https://…”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

6. ai-native userIssue scoped/least-privilege API credentials for an agent

   weight 2 · round drawn
   Motion—none0/10

   Evidence shows Motion has a general API and 'Permissions & Access Control' as a pricing-tier feature, but nothing documents scoped or least-privilege API credentials/tokens specifically for agent use. Missing for 10: documentation of API key scoping, granular permission levels for tokens, or agent-specific credential issuance.

   • [claimed-docs] “API access for creating, updating, and managing projects and tasks.”
   • [claimed-docs] “The API reference has a complete guide on all our endpoints.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Permissions & Access Control”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   SavvyCal's docs show OAuth2 and personal access token authentication for its API, but there is no evidence of scope definitions, granular permissions, or least-privilege credential issuance tailored for an agent use case.

   • [claimed-docs] “OAuth 2.0: OAuth2 ... HTTP: Bearer Auth ... Personal access token authentication”
   • [claimed-docs] “OAuth 2.0 authorization code flow ... Personal access token authentication”
   • [claimed-docs] “OAuth 2.0: OAuth2 ... Personal access token authentication ... Bearer format: pt_secret_XXXXXXXXX”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

7. ai-native userBuild against official SDKs

   weight 2 · round to Motion
   Motion~partialclaimed5/10

   Motion has a documented API with reference docs and cookbooks for tasks/projects, which supports building against its API, but there is no evidence of official language-specific SDKs (e.g., Python, JS/TS client libraries), versioning, or authentication/rate-limit details typically expected for 'official SDKs'. missing for 10: dedicated SDK packages (e.g. npm/pypi clients), SDK versioning/release notes, authentication and error-handling guides, independent developer corroboration of SDK usage.

   • [claimed-docs] “API access for creating, updating, and managing projects and tasks.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Our cookbooks are a great place to get started for fully fleshed out examples!”
   • [claimed-docs] “Explore our guides and examples to integrate Motion.”
   • [claimed-docs] “The API reference has a complete guide on all our endpoints.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal~partialprobed4/10

   SavvyCal offers a documented REST API with OAuth/PAT auth, webhooks, and a JavaScript embed library, giving developers programmatic access, but there is no evidence of official language-specific SDKs (e.g., Python, Node, Ruby) beyond the JS embed script, and probes show no OpenAPI spec or llms.txt available for AI tooling. Missing for 10: dedicated official SDK libraries in multiple languages, published OpenAPI/swagger spec, and AI-discoverable docs (llms.txt) that would support agentic building.

   • [claimed-docs] “The SavvyCal API adheres to REST conventions. Our API communicates in JSON format and uses OAuth access tokens to authenticate requests.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Our JavaScript library allows you to embed your scheduling links on your website (both inline and as a popover).”
   • [claimed-docs] “We offer several ways to integrate with our product, including a REST API, webhooks, and a JavaScript embed library.”
   • [probe] “PROBE llms.txt: HTTP 404 at https://developers.savvycal.com/llms.txt”
   • [probe] “PROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://developers.savvycal.com/openapi.json, https://developers.savvycal.com/swagger.json, https://…”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

8. ai-native userSubscribe to events via webhooks

   weight 2 · round to SavvyCal
   Motion—none0/10

   No evidence of a webhook subscription mechanism; Motion's docs mention API access, cookbooks, and third-party Zapier integration but nothing about outbound webhooks or event subscriptions. Missing for 10: any documentation of a webhook endpoint, event types, or subscription API.

   • [claimed-docs] “API access for creating, updating, and managing projects and tasks.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Connect with thousands of the most popular apps using Zapier.”
   • [claimed-docs] “The API reference has a complete guide on all our endpoints.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal✓fullprobed8/10

   SavvyCal has documented webhook support with HTTP POST notifications on account changes, HMAC-SHA256 signature verification, and setup instructions via Settings > Integrations, enabling event-driven subscription for automation/agent use cases. Missing for 10: no independent/hands-on corroboration or public OpenAPI/webhook schema (openapi probe returned 404s), and no explicit list of subscribable event types.

   • [claimed-docs] “Webhooks allow you to listen for changes in a SavvyCal account and get notified via HTTP POST requests.”
   • [claimed-docs] “SavvyCal signs the request body with a SHA-256 HMAC signature. The signature is included in the x-savvycal-signature header.”
   • [claimed-docs] “SavvyCal signs the request body with a SHA-256 HMAC signature.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Navigate to Settings > Integrations and click the + icon in the Webhooks”
   • [claimed-docs] “We offer several ways to integrate with our product, including a REST API, webhooks, and a JavaScript embed library.”
   • [probe] “PROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://developers.savvycal.com/openapi.json, https://developers.savvycal.com/swagger.json, https://…”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

Agentic features

1. ai-native userGet AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the product

   weight 2 · round to Motion
   Motion✓fullclaimed7/10

   Motion's docs describe multiple AI-generated insights derived from user data: proactive at-risk task/project warnings, priority highlighting, predictive project completion dates, an AI Search Assistant, and an AI Workflow Builder that infers workflows from SOPs — all directly analyzing the user's tasks/projects/calendar to surface suggestions. missing for 10: independent/hands-on verification of insight accuracy and no detail on how suggestions are surfaced/explained to users beyond marketing copy.

   • [claimed-docs] “Motion analyzes all your work and highlights your #1 priority at any moment—so you stop wasting time evaluating what you need to work on nex…”
   • [claimed-docs] “When Motion thinks a task is at-risk of missing deadline, it proactively warns you days, weeks, or months in advance.”
   • [claimed-docs] “As soon as a project is off-track, Motion alerts you so that you can course-correct before it's too late.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Motion flags at-risk tasks early, so you can address potential delays before they affect your project.”
   • [claimed-docs] “we can predict exactly when a project will finish based on your team's capacity, and all the other ongoing projects.”
   • [claimed-docs] “AI Search Assistant Instantly finds anything - docs, notes, project, task, communication”
   • [claimed-docs] “AI Workflow Builder Automatically builds workflows based on SOPs”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   No evidence of AI-generated insights, analytics, or suggestions surfaced within SavvyCal; the product is a scheduling tool with API/webhook/workflow automation features but nothing about AI-derived insights from user data.

   ⚑ flag

2. ai-native userSet up automations that run autonomously in the background

   weight 2 · round to SavvyCal
   Motion~partialclaimed6/10

   Motion's vendor docs describe multiple background automations that run without manual intervention—auto-scheduling/reshuffling calendars, auto-blocking recurring tasks, projects advancing on their own as blockers clear, email/voice-to-task capture, and an AI Workflow Builder that auto-builds workflows from SOPs. This directly matches 'autonomous background automation' for a task/calendar-native persona, but all evidence is vendor-authored feature copy with no independent/hands-on confirmation that these automations reliably run unattended over time. Missing for 10: independent verification or user testimonials of autonomous operation, and detail on failure/error handling when automations run without oversight.

   • [claimed-docs] “Motion reshuffles your entire day (and week) in seconds—protecting your time and mental bandwidth from manual reorganization.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Create custom time windows for your tasks and watch Motion slot them in perfectly, ensuring you never miss a deadline.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Create daily, weekly, monthly, or quarterly tasks and Motion's AI Task Manager will block time on your calendar regularly so you get them do…”
   • [claimed-docs] “a project will just move forward by itself when team members complete their blocking tasks. Nothing ever gets stuck - and if it does, Motion…”
   • [claimed-docs] “Forward emails to Motion and we'll automatically schedule them as tasks.”
   • [claimed-docs] “AI Workflow Builder Automatically builds workflows based on SOPs”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal✓fullclaimed7/10

   SavvyCal's Workflows feature lets users attach multi-action automations to scheduling links that trigger automatically on meeting lifecycle events (booked, canceled, reminders) without manual intervention, and further extend via Zapier for CRM/task automations — this matches autonomous background automation. Missing for 10: independent/hands-on verification of workflow reliability, evidence of conditional/branching logic or scheduled (non-event-triggered) automations, and any AI-specific automation capability.

   • [claimed-docs] “It’s never been easier to send customized meeting lifecycle messages and automate manual tasks with SavvyCal workflows.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Attach workflows to one or more links to save yourself from repetitive work.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Trigger no-code automations with Zapier ... Sync with your CRM, send yourself reminders, create project management to-do’s…the sky’s the lim…”
   • [claimed-docs] “Keep your automations neatly organized with powerful multi-action workflows.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Create or update CRM records, send yourself reminders, or create to-do’s in your project management software.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Customize the timing and content of your reminders to increase attendance. Compose from scratch or pick one of our handy templates.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

3. ai-native userDelegate tasks to a built-in AI assistant inside the product

   weight 3 · round to Motion
   Motion~partialclaimed6/10

   Motion offers several built-in AI capabilities (AI Task Manager, AI Project Manager, AI Workflow Builder, AI Search Assistant, AI Meeting Notetaker) that autonomously prioritize, schedule, and flag work, which functions as a form of task delegation to AI. However, evidence shows these as automation features embedded in workflows rather than a conversational assistant interface you explicitly delegate to, and there's no independent corroboration of real-world delegation experience. Missing for 10: a clear conversational/chat-based delegation interface, first-person or independent user accounts of delegating tasks to the assistant, and confirmation of agentic task execution beyond scheduling/alerts.

   • [claimed-docs] “Create custom time windows for your tasks and watch Motion slot them in perfectly, ensuring you never miss a deadline.”
   • [claimed-docs] “a project will just move forward by itself when team members complete their blocking tasks. Nothing ever gets stuck - and if it does, Motion…”
   • [claimed-docs] “As soon as a project is off-track, Motion alerts you so that you can course-correct before it's too late.”
   • [claimed-docs] “AI Search Assistant Instantly finds anything - docs, notes, project, task, communication”
   • [claimed-docs] “AI Workflow Builder Automatically builds workflows based on SOPs”
   • [claimed-docs] “Motion flags at-risk tasks early, so you can address potential delays before they affect your project.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   The only remotely related item, 'Delegate to an assistant' (savvycal-docs-59), refers to giving a human executive assistant account access on a pricing page, not a built-in AI assistant. No evidence anywhere in the pack of an AI assistant feature users can delegate tasks to within SavvyCal.

   • [claimed-docs] “Delegate to an assistant”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

4. ai-native userOperate the product with natural-language commands

   weight 2 · round to Motion
   Motion~partialclaimed4/10

   Motion offers some natural-language-adjacent entry points—voice task creation via Siri, email-to-task conversion, and an AI workflow builder based on SOPs—but there's no evidence of a conversational/chat interface for operating the full product (projects, scheduling, prioritization) via free-form natural language; the API is a structured REST interface, not NL. missing for 10: dedicated NL chat/command interface, evidence of broad task/project operations via typed natural language, independent hands-on confirmation.

   • [claimed-docs] “Quickly create tasks with your voice, and Motion's AI scheduling algorithm will automatically put them on your calendar.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Forward emails to Motion and we'll automatically schedule them as tasks.”
   • [claimed-docs] “turn Zoom/Meet/Teams meetings or Slack/Teams messages into tasks, or tell Siri to add tasks via voice command.”
   • [claimed-docs] “AI Workflow Builder Automatically builds workflows based on SOPs”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   No evidence of any natural-language command interface, AI assistant, or chat-based control for SavvyCal; the evidence only covers scheduling features, REST API, webhooks, and OAuth. Probes for llms.txt and OpenAPI spec both returned 404, further indicating no AI-native interface layer.

   • [probe] “PROBE llms.txt: HTTP 404 at https://developers.savvycal.com/llms.txt”
   • [probe] “PROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://developers.savvycal.com/openapi.json, https://developers.savvycal.com/swagger.json, https://…”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

Api quality

1. ai-native userExplore an interactive API reference with runnable examples

   weight 2 · round to Motion
   Motion~partialclaimed3/10

   There is a reference to an API reference page and cookbooks/examples (motion-docs-28, motion-docs-29, motion-docs-2), suggesting documentation with guides, but no evidence of an interactive, runnable API reference (e.g., try-it console, live code execution) is provided. missing for 10: evidence of interactivity/runnable examples in the API reference, first-party demonstration of a live sandbox or code runner, independent corroboration of hands-on use.

   • [claimed-docs] “Our cookbooks are a great place to get started for fully fleshed out examples!”
   • [claimed-docs] “Explore our guides and examples to integrate Motion.”
   • [claimed-docs] “The API reference has a complete guide on all our endpoints.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   Evidence confirms SavvyCal has a REST API with OAuth/bearer/personal-access-token docs, but nothing describes an interactive reference with runnable/try-it examples, and probes for openapi.json/swagger.json/llms.txt all return 404, suggesting no such interactive spec is discoverable.

   • [claimed-docs] “The SavvyCal API adheres to REST conventions. Our API communicates in JSON format and uses OAuth access tokens to authenticate requests.”
   • [claimed-docs] “We offer several ways to integrate with our product, including a REST API, webhooks, and a JavaScript embed library.”
   • [probe] “PROBE llms.txt: HTTP 404 at https://developers.savvycal.com/llms.txt”
   • [probe] “PROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://developers.savvycal.com/openapi.json, https://developers.savvycal.com/swagger.json, https://…”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

2. ai-native userDownload a machine-readable API spec (OpenAPI or equivalent)

   weight 2 · round to Motion
   Motion~partialclaimed4/10

   Motion has a public API reference site (docs.usemotion.com/api-reference/) implying documented endpoints, but no evidence explicitly confirms a downloadable OpenAPI/Swagger spec file or machine-readable schema is provided. Missing for 10: explicit OpenAPI/Swagger JSON or YAML download link, confirmation the API reference is machine-readable/spec-generated, and independent confirmation of spec availability.

   • [claimed-docs] “The API reference has a complete guide on all our endpoints.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Our cookbooks are a great place to get started for fully fleshed out examples!”
   • [claimed-docs] “Explore our guides and examples to integrate Motion.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   SavvyCal documents a REST API with OAuth/PAT auth (savvycal-docs-1, -38, -52), and the API reference format (Bearer Auth listings) suggests it may be generated from an OpenAPI schema, but no evidence shows a downloadable OpenAPI/Swagger spec is actually published. Direct probes for openapi.json, swagger.json, and llms.txt all returned 404, contradicting any claim of a machine-readable spec being available.

   • [claimed-docs] “We offer several ways to integrate with our product, including a REST API, webhooks, and a JavaScript embed library.”
   • [claimed-docs] “OAuth 2.0: OAuth2 ... Personal access token authentication ... Bearer format: pt_secret_XXXXXXXXX”
   • [probe] “PROBE llms.txt: HTTP 404 at https://developers.savvycal.com/llms.txt”
   • [probe] “PROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://developers.savvycal.com/openapi.json, https://developers.savvycal.com/swagger.json, https://…”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

3. ai-native userTest against a sandbox environment without touching production data

   weight 1 · round drawn
   Motion—none0/10

   No evidence of a sandbox/test environment or non-production API mode is mentioned anywhere in the docs; only production API and feature docs are cited. Missing for 10: any mention of a sandbox environment, test/staging API keys, or mock data mode.

   ⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   No evidence of a sandbox, test mode, or staging environment for the SavvyCal API; docs only cover REST API, OAuth, webhooks and personal access tokens with no mention of test data isolation.

   • [claimed-docs] “The SavvyCal API adheres to REST conventions. Our API communicates in JSON format and uses OAuth access tokens to authenticate requests.”
   • [claimed-docs] “We offer several ways to integrate with our product, including a REST API, webhooks, and a JavaScript embed library.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

4. ai-native userRely on versioned APIs with a documented deprecation policy

   weight 2 · round drawn
   Motion—none0/10

   Motion has a documented API and cookbooks (motion-docs-1, motion-docs-28, motion-docs-29), so the axis of API governance clearly applies, but no evidence anywhere mentions API versioning scheme, version numbers, or a deprecation policy for breaking changes.

   • [claimed-docs] “API access for creating, updating, and managing projects and tasks.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Explore our guides and examples to integrate Motion.”
   • [claimed-docs] “The API reference has a complete guide on all our endpoints.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   The evidence shows SavvyCal has a REST API with OAuth/PAT authentication, but there is no mention anywhere of API versioning or a documented deprecation policy, and probes for openapi/llms.txt specs failed (404s). Missing for 10: any documentation of API version numbers, changelog, or deprecation/sunset policy.

   • [claimed-docs] “The SavvyCal API adheres to REST conventions. Our API communicates in JSON format and uses OAuth access tokens to authenticate requests.”
   • [probe] “PROBE llms.txt: HTTP 404 at https://developers.savvycal.com/llms.txt”
   • [probe] “PROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://developers.savvycal.com/openapi.json, https://developers.savvycal.com/swagger.json, https://…”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

Ai calendar

1. knowledge workerAI finds and continuously optimizes the best meeting time across all attendees' calendars, not just the first open slot

   weight 1 · round to Motion
   Motion~partialclaimed5/10

   Motion's AI calendar/meeting assistant reshuffles schedules and books meetings, but evidence focuses on single-user auto-scheduling and booking links (embed calendar for prospects) rather than multi-attendee cross-calendar optimization that continuously re-evaluates the best slot as all attendees' calendars change. No documented capability for polling multiple attendees' availability and iteratively finding a globally optimal time beyond first available slot. missing for 10: evidence of true multi-attendee negotiation/optimization across all invitees' calendars, evidence of continuous re-optimization after initial booking, and independent/hands-on confirmation of this specific behavior.

   • [claimed-docs] “Motion reshuffles your entire day (and week) in seconds—protecting your time and mental bandwidth from manual reorganization.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Combine all your calendars in one view. Turn all of your calendar accounts—Outlook, Google, iCloud—into one single interface.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Share your schedule anywhere—embed Motion's AI Calendar on your website so prospects can book your ideal time slots instantly.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Connect instantly with zero setup. Video conferencing links are automatically added to every meeting, eliminating the pre-meeting scramble f…”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   SavvyCal offers collective/round-robin availability views and 'ranked availability windows' but these are rule-based scheduling features, not an AI system that finds and continuously re-optimizes the best time as calendars change; no evidence of any AI/ML-driven optimization engine is present in the evidence pack.

   • [claimed-docs] “Show collective availability to book any available team member.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Present ranked availability windows to encourage recipients to pick the optimal time (while still remaining flexible).”
   • [claimed-docs] “Show combined availability for your whole team and automatically route each booked meeting to the right person.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

2. knowledge workerAI schedules my tasks into real calendar blocks around meetings and deadlines, and re-plans automatically when things change

   weight 2 · round to Motion
   Motion✓fullclaimed7/10

   Motion's core value proposition directly matches the story: it auto-schedules tasks into calendar time blocks around deadlines and custom time windows (motion-docs-10, motion-docs-12), reshuffles the whole day/week automatically when things change (motion-docs-3), and proactively flags at-risk deadlines (motion-docs-11, motion-docs-39). Missing for 10: independent/hands-on verification of the re-planning behavior in practice (all evidence is vendor-authored marketing/docs), and no evidence of accuracy/reliability under real-world meeting conflicts.

   • [claimed-docs] “Motion reshuffles your entire day (and week) in seconds—protecting your time and mental bandwidth from manual reorganization.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Create custom time windows for your tasks and watch Motion slot them in perfectly, ensuring you never miss a deadline.”
   • [claimed-docs] “When Motion thinks a task is at-risk of missing deadline, it proactively warns you days, weeks, or months in advance.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Create daily, weekly, monthly, or quarterly tasks and Motion's AI Task Manager will block time on your calendar regularly so you get them do…”
   • [claimed-docs] “Quickly create tasks with your voice, and Motion's AI scheduling algorithm will automatically put them on your calendar.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Motion flags at-risk tasks early, so you can address potential delays before they affect your project.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   SavvyCal is a scheduling-link tool with API/webhooks/workflows, but there is no evidence of AI-driven autonomous task scheduling into calendar blocks or automatic re-planning around deadlines/meetings; its 'workflows' are manual/trigger-based automations, not AI task planning.

   • [claimed-docs] “Budget your time using calendar events, and wire up SavvyCal to honor those preferences.”
   • [claimed-docs] “It’s never been easier to send customized meeting lifecycle messages and automate manual tasks with SavvyCal workflows.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Keep your automations neatly organized with powerful multi-action workflows.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

3. knowledge workerThe product auto-defends recurring focus time and habits, flexibly moving them when conflicts appear instead of dropping them

   weight 2 · round to Motion
   Motion~partialclaimed6/10

   Motion's AI Calendar explicitly reshuffles the day/week to protect time from conflicts, and its Task Manager auto-blocks recurring (daily/weekly/monthly/quarterly) tasks and reschedules at-risk deadlines rather than dropping them, which matches the 'defend and flexibly move recurring commitments' story. However, no documentation specifically calls out 'recurring focus time blocks' or habit-protection as a distinct feature (only recurring tasks and general rescheduling are described), and there's no independent/hands-on confirmation of this exact conflict-resolution behavior. Missing for 10: explicit recurring focus-time/habit-protection feature docs, third-party or hands-on validation that conflicts trigger rescheduling rather than deletion.

   • [claimed-docs] “Motion reshuffles your entire day (and week) in seconds—protecting your time and mental bandwidth from manual reorganization.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Create custom time windows for your tasks and watch Motion slot them in perfectly, ensuring you never miss a deadline.”
   • [claimed-docs] “When Motion thinks a task is at-risk of missing deadline, it proactively warns you days, weeks, or months in advance.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Create daily, weekly, monthly, or quarterly tasks and Motion's AI Task Manager will block time on your calendar regularly so you get them do…”
   • [claimed-docs] “Motion flags at-risk tasks early, so you can address potential delays before they affect your project.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   SavvyCal's evidence covers scheduling links, availability, round robin, workflows, and payments, but there is no mention of auto-defending recurring focus time/habits or dynamically rescheduling blocked time when conflicts arise. The 'budget your time using calendar events' feature (docs-12) is the closest but only describes honoring preferences during booking, not proactive conflict-driven rescheduling of habits.

   • [claimed-docs] “Budget your time using calendar events, and wire up SavvyCal to honor those preferences.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

1. ai-native userPerform bulk operations across many items at once

   weight 2 · round to Motion
   Motion~partialclaimed3/10

   Motion documents a general API for creating/updating/managing projects and tasks with a full API reference, which could support scripted bulk actions, but no evidence describes batch/bulk endpoints, rate limits for bulk use, or examples of multi-item operations. Missing for 10: explicit bulk/batch API endpoints, documented rate limits or pagination for large-scale operations, and any hands-on example of bulk task/project manipulation.

   • [claimed-docs] “API access for creating, updating, and managing projects and tasks.”
   • [claimed-docs] “The API reference has a complete guide on all our endpoints.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Our cookbooks are a great place to get started for fully fleshed out examples!”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   SavvyCal exposes a REST API and webhooks, which could in principle support bulk operations, but no evidence describes any batch/bulk endpoints, batch scheduling actions, or bulk update/import/export capability across links, meetings, or contacts.

   • [claimed-docs] “The SavvyCal API adheres to REST conventions. Our API communicates in JSON format and uses OAuth access tokens to authenticate requests.”
   • [claimed-docs] “We offer several ways to integrate with our product, including a REST API, webhooks, and a JavaScript embed library.”
   • [probe] “PROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://developers.savvycal.com/openapi.json, https://developers.savvycal.com/swagger.json, https://…”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

2. ai-native userDefine rules that trigger actions automatically on events

   weight 3 · round to SavvyCal
   Motion~partialclaimed4/10

   Motion has built-in automated behaviors (task risk alerts, project off-track alerts, meeting caps, auto-scheduling) but these are fixed AI features rather than user-definable trigger→action rules; genuine custom automation appears to require third-party Zapier integration rather than a native rules engine. Missing for 10: a native rule/trigger builder documented with examples, evidence of user-defined conditional logic, and independent confirmation that Zapier-based automations work as described.

   • [claimed-docs] “a project will just move forward by itself when team members complete their blocking tasks. Nothing ever gets stuck - and if it does, Motion…”
   • [claimed-docs] “As soon as a project is off-track, Motion alerts you so that you can course-correct before it's too late.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Put a cap on meeting overload. Set daily limits and watch Motion enforce them automatically.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Connect with thousands of the most popular apps using Zapier.”
   • [claimed-docs] “AI Workflow Builder Automatically builds workflows based on SOPs”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal~partialclaimed7/10

   SavvyCal's Workflows feature lets users attach multi-action automations to scheduling links that trigger on meeting lifecycle events (booked, reminder, follow-up), and webhooks plus Zapier extend this to external CRM/task actions, which is genuine event-driven automation. However the evidence shows this is scoped to meeting-lifecycle triggers rather than general conditional rule logic (if/then branching) across arbitrary events. Missing for 10: documented conditional/branching rule syntax, evidence of custom trigger conditions beyond meeting stages, and independent/hands-on confirmation of workflow reliability.

   • [claimed-docs] “It’s never been easier to send customized meeting lifecycle messages and automate manual tasks with SavvyCal workflows.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Attach workflows to one or more links to save yourself from repetitive work.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Keep your automations neatly organized with powerful multi-action workflows.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Create or update CRM records, send yourself reminders, or create to-do’s in your project management software.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Trigger no-code automations with Zapier ... Sync with your CRM, send yourself reminders, create project management to-do’s…the sky’s the lim…”
   • [claimed-docs] “Webhooks allow you to listen for changes in a SavvyCal account and get notified via HTTP POST requests.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Navigate to Settings > Integrations and click the + icon in the Webhooks”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

3. ai-native userSchedule recurring jobs or workflows

   weight 2 · round to Motion
   Motion~partialclaimed6/10

   Motion natively supports recurring tasks (daily/weekly/monthly/quarterly) that auto-schedule on the calendar, and offers a general task/project API plus an 'AI Workflow Builder' that builds workflows from SOPs, which together provide the building blocks for recurring/automated scheduling. However, there's no explicit documentation confirming the API itself exposes recurrence/cron-like scheduling for AI-native/programmatic workflow orchestration. Missing for 10: explicit API/webhook support for creating recurring jobs programmatically, and independent confirmation of the AI Workflow Builder's recurring capability.

   • [claimed-docs] “Create daily, weekly, monthly, or quarterly tasks and Motion's AI Task Manager will block time on your calendar regularly so you get them do…”
   • [claimed-docs] “API access for creating, updating, and managing projects and tasks.”
   • [claimed-docs] “AI Workflow Builder Automatically builds workflows based on SOPs”
   • [claimed-docs] “The API reference has a complete guide on all our endpoints.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   SavvyCal's 'workflows' feature (docs-15/16/25/26) triggers actions based on meeting lifecycle events (booking, reminders, CRM updates), not on a recurring/cron-like schedule independent of a meeting trigger; there is no evidence of scheduling arbitrary recurring jobs or workflows for AI-native automation.

   • [claimed-docs] “It’s never been easier to send customized meeting lifecycle messages and automate manual tasks with SavvyCal workflows.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Attach workflows to one or more links to save yourself from repetitive work.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Keep your automations neatly organized with powerful multi-action workflows.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Create or update CRM records, send yourself reminders, or create to-do’s in your project management software.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Trigger no-code automations with Zapier ... Sync with your CRM, send yourself reminders, create project management to-do’s…the sky’s the lim…”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

4. ai-native userVersion, review, and roll back my automations

   weight 1 · round drawn
   Motion—none0/10

   No evidence of versioning, review, or rollback capabilities for automations/workflows in Motion's docs or community feedback; the evidence only covers scheduling, task management, and API access without any version-control features.

   ⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   SavvyCal offers workflows/automations (docs-15, docs-16, docs-25) but there is no evidence of any version history, change review, diffing, or rollback capability for these automations or workflows.

   ⚑ flag

Booking

1. founderShare a booking link where invitees pick a time from my live availability — no back-and-forth email

   weight 3 · round to SavvyCal
   Motion✓fullclaimed7/10

   Motion offers embeddable booking via its AI Calendar so prospects/invitees can pick a slot from live availability directly, and its meeting assistant supports templates, limits, and calendar consolidation to keep availability accurate. Missing for 10: no direct evidence of a standalone shareable 'booking link' (only 'embed on website'), and no independent/hands-on confirmation of the booking flow's reliability.

   • [claimed-docs] “embed Motion's AI Calendar on your website so prospects can book your ideal time slots instantly.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Share your schedule anywhere—embed Motion's AI Calendar on your website so prospects can book your ideal time slots instantly.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Build a template for every scenario. Client calls, board meetings, team all hands, sales demos—create a custom template for each with specif…”
   • [claimed-docs] “Combine all your calendars in one view. Turn all of your calendar accounts—Outlook, Google, iCloud—into one single interface.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Set daily limits and watch Motion enforce them automatically. When you hit your threshold, your calendar becomes unbookable—no more accident…”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal✓fullclaimed9/10

   SavvyCal's core product is booking links that show live availability, embeddable via widget/hyperlink/JS, with calendar overlay so invitees pick a mutual time without email back-and-forth. This is well documented across multiple first-party pages. Missing for 10: independent/third-party hands-on corroboration beyond vendor docs.

   • [claimed-docs] “Adjust the colors, banner image, and avatar that appear on your links to match your unique style.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Host your scheduling links on your own custom domain, for a professional white-labeled booking experience.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Recipients can even overlay their calendar on top of your link to spot ideal times at a glance!”
   • [claimed-docs] “The recipient can view their calendar events on top of your scheduling link, to save them the hassle of clicking back and forth.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Let visitors schedule time without ever leaving your website. Trigger your embedded link via hyperlink, the floating button, or a JavaScript…”
   • [claimed-docs] “Generate a snippet of text to propose times in just seconds. Recipients can pick a time to meet in just two clicks.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

2. founderOffer multiple event types with their own durations, locations, custom questions, and confirmation rules

   weight 2 · round to Motion
   Motion~partialclaimed5/10

   Motion's meeting assistant explicitly supports creating multiple templates with distinct durations, pre-meeting custom questions, and reminders, plus embeddable booking links and daily meeting limits — covering much of the story. However, there is no explicit mention of per-event-type location settings or configurable confirmation/approval rules for bookings. Missing for 10: documented location-per-event-type support, confirmation/approval workflow settings, independent verification of these booking-link features in practice.

   • [claimed-docs] “Build a template for every scenario. Client calls, board meetings, team all hands, sales demos—create a custom template for each with specif…”
   • [claimed-docs] “embed Motion's AI Calendar on your website so prospects can book your ideal time slots instantly.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Share your schedule anywhere—embed Motion's AI Calendar on your website so prospects can book your ideal time slots instantly.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Set daily limits and watch Motion enforce them automatically. When you hit your threshold, your calendar becomes unbookable—no more accident…”
   • [claimed-docs] “Put a cap on meeting overload. Set daily limits and watch Motion enforce them automatically.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal~partialclaimed4/10

   Evidence confirms SavvyCal supports multiple customizable scheduling links (branding, payment integration, booking limits, workflows attached to links), implying separate 'event types' per link, but nothing in the pack explicitly documents per-link duration settings, location options, custom intake questions, or confirmation/approval rules. missing for 10: explicit docs on setting duration per link, location fields, custom questions builder, and confirmation-required vs auto-confirm booking rules.

   • [claimed-docs] “Connect your link to a corresponding product in your Stripe account and require payment before reserving the meeting time.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Limit how many meetings are allowed on a per-day, week, and month basis.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Attach workflows to one or more links to save yourself from repetitive work.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Adjust the colors, banner image, and avatar that appear on your links to match your unique style.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Host your scheduling links on your own custom domain, for a professional white-labeled booking experience.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Prevent meeting overload and cap quantity per day, week, and month.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

Booking controls

1. knowledge workerProtect my calendar with buffers before and after meetings, minimum notice, daily booking caps, and date-range windows

   weight 2 · round to SavvyCal
   Motion~partialclaimed4/10

   Motion's docs confirm daily meeting caps that make the calendar unbookable once reached (motion-docs-6, motion-docs-38) and booking-link embedding (motion-docs-5, motion-docs-27), but there is no evidence of buffer time before/after meetings, minimum notice requirements, or date-range booking windows. missing for 10: buffer time settings, minimum notice period, date-range window limits, independent verification of these booking-link controls.

   • [claimed-docs] “Set daily limits and watch Motion enforce them automatically. When you hit your threshold, your calendar becomes unbookable—no more accident…”
   • [claimed-docs] “Put a cap on meeting overload. Set daily limits and watch Motion enforce them automatically.”
   • [claimed-docs] “embed Motion's AI Calendar on your website so prospects can book your ideal time slots instantly.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Share your schedule anywhere—embed Motion's AI Calendar on your website so prospects can book your ideal time slots instantly.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal~partialclaimed5/10

   SavvyCal explicitly documents daily/weekly/monthly booking caps (docs-11, docs-36) and 'budget your time' calendar-based preferences that could relate to buffers/notice (docs-12), but there is no explicit mention of configurable pre/post-meeting buffers, minimum notice period, or date-range availability windows in the evidence pack. missing for 10: explicit buffer-before/after-meeting settings, minimum notice period configuration, and date-range window limits.

   • [claimed-docs] “Limit how many meetings are allowed on a per-day, week, and month basis.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Prevent meeting overload and cap quantity per day, week, and month.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Budget your time using calendar events, and wire up SavvyCal to honor those preferences.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

2. founderCollect payment (e.g. via Stripe) at the moment of booking for paid sessions

   weight 1 · round to SavvyCal
   Motion—none0/10

   Evidence shows Motion's booking/calendar embed lets prospects book time slots, but nowhere does it mention payment collection, Stripe integration, or charging at booking time. Missing for 10: any mention of payment/Stripe integration, paid session booking, or checkout flow at time of scheduling.

   • [claimed-docs] “embed Motion's AI Calendar on your website so prospects can book your ideal time slots instantly.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Share your schedule anywhere—embed Motion's AI Calendar on your website so prospects can book your ideal time slots instantly.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal✓fullclaimed8/10

   SavvyCal's docs explicitly describe connecting a Stripe product to a scheduling link and requiring payment before reserving the meeting time, plus Stripe Tax support for sales tax/VAT/GST and native management of offerings/pricing within SavvyCal. This directly matches the founder story of collecting payment at booking. Missing for 10: independent/hands-on verification of the payment flow (all evidence is vendor docs) and no detail on payment failure/refund handling.

   • [claimed-docs] “Connect your link to a corresponding product in your Stripe account and require payment before reserving the meeting time.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Calculate and collect sales tax, VAT, and GST with the click of a button (powered by Stripe Tax).”
   • [claimed-docs] “You don’t even have to leave SavvyCal to create new offerings or adjust your prices. Do it all natively within SavvyCal.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Connect your Stripe account to collect payments on your scheduling links. Collect sales tax if needed & accept any payment method available …”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

3. knowledge workerInvitees always see slots in their own time zone — detection, display, and DST handling are automatic

   weight 3 · round drawn
   Motion—none0/10

   No evidence in the pack addresses timezone detection, display, or DST handling for booking-link invitees; the docs focus on scheduling AI, task/project management, and integrations without mentioning timezone logic.

   ⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   No evidence pack item mentions time zone detection, display, or DST handling for invitees; the docs focus on API, webhooks, embedding, team scheduling, and payments but never address time zone automation.

   ⚑ flag

Calendars

1. knowledge workerBusy blocks sync between my work and personal calendars automatically so all my schedules stay in step

   weight 2 · round drawn
   Motion~partialclaimed5/10

   Motion docs show it combines multiple calendar accounts (Outlook, Google, iCloud) into one unified interface and auto-schedules tasks/meetings across them, implying busy blocks sync across connected calendars, but there is no explicit documentation confirming two-way busy-block syncing specifically between separate 'work' and 'personal' calendar accounts to keep both in step. missing for 10: explicit documentation of cross-account busy-block sync mechanics, confirmation of two-way conflict prevention across distinct work/personal calendars, and independent/hands-on verification of this specific sync behavior.

   • [claimed-docs] “Combine all your calendars in one view. Turn all of your calendar accounts—Outlook, Google, iCloud—into one single interface.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Motion reshuffles your entire day (and week) in seconds—protecting your time and mental bandwidth from manual reorganization.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal~partialclaimed5/10

   SavvyCal's docs reference including external/multiple calendars in availability checks and budgeting time via calendar events, implying busy blocks from connected calendars feed into scheduling, but no evidence explicitly describes connecting a personal AND work calendar and syncing busy blocks automatically between them for an individual user's own scheduling link. missing for 10: explicit documentation of multi-calendar (work+personal) connection and automatic busy-block sync for a single user, plus independent/hands-on confirmation.

   • [claimed-docs] “Include external calendars when showing team availability.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Budget your time using calendar events, and wire up SavvyCal to honor those preferences.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Allow recipients to overlay their calendar on top of yours to easily find mutual availability.”
   • [claimed-docs] “The recipient can view their calendar events on top of your scheduling link, to save them the hassle of clicking back and forth.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

2. knowledge workerConnect several calendars (Google, Outlook, Apple) and every one is checked for conflicts so I never get double-booked

   weight 3 · round to Motion
   Motion~partialclaimed6/10

   Motion explicitly supports combining Google, Outlook, and iCloud calendars into one unified view (motion-docs-8), and its AI Calendar/AI Meeting Assistant features are built to auto-schedule and reshuffle time to avoid overlaps (motion-docs-3, motion-docs-6, motion-docs-38). However, there is no explicit documentation of a dedicated cross-calendar conflict-detection mechanism guaranteeing 'never double-booked' across all three providers simultaneously. Missing for 10: explicit conflict-detection/double-booking-prevention documentation, independent verification of multi-calendar sync reliability.

   • [claimed-docs] “Combine all your calendars in one view. Turn all of your calendar accounts—Outlook, Google, iCloud—into one single interface.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Motion reshuffles your entire day (and week) in seconds—protecting your time and mental bandwidth from manual reorganization.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Set daily limits and watch Motion enforce them automatically. When you hit your threshold, your calendar becomes unbookable—no more accident…”
   • [claimed-docs] “Put a cap on meeting overload. Set daily limits and watch Motion enforce them automatically.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   The evidence pack covers API/webhooks, round-robin scheduling, payments, and workflows, but contains no mention of connecting multiple external calendars (Google/Outlook/Apple) or cross-calendar conflict checking for double-booking prevention — the closest items reference 'external calendars' only in the context of team availability aggregation, not personal multi-calendar conflict-checking.

   • [claimed-docs] “Include external calendars when showing team availability.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

3. knowledge workerDefine availability schedules with working hours, date overrides, and out-of-office periods

   weight 2 · round to SavvyCal
   Motion—none0/10

   The evidence pack describes Motion's calendar-combining, meeting-limit, and task-scheduling features but never mentions configurable working-hours schedules, date-specific overrides, or out-of-office periods, which is the core of this story. Since calendar-management is clearly within Motion's product category, this is an applicable but unevidenced capability, not an out-of-category one.

   ⚑ flag

   SavvyCal~partialclaimed3/10

   Evidence only tangentially references availability settings — 'preset work hours' for round-robin links and 'budget your time using calendar events' to honor scheduling preferences — but there is no explicit documentation of a full availability-schedule builder with working hours, date overrides, or dedicated out-of-office periods. missing for 10: explicit docs on defining weekly working-hour schedules, date-specific overrides, and out-of-office blocking.

   • [claimed-docs] “Budget your time using calendar events, and wire up SavvyCal to honor those preferences.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Team members can set custom availability for each round robin scheduling link or default to their preset work hours.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Limit how many meetings are allowed on a per-day, week, and month basis.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Prevent meeting overload and cap quantity per day, week, and month.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

Platform

1. developerWebhooks notify my systems in real time when bookings are created, rescheduled, or canceled

   weight 2 · round to SavvyCal
   Motion—none0/10

   Evidence shows Motion has an API for projects/tasks and booking/calendar features, but nothing in the pack describes webhooks or real-time event notifications for booking creation, rescheduling, or cancellation. Missing for 10: any mention of webhook endpoints, event subscriptions, or push notifications for booking lifecycle events.

   • [claimed-docs] “API access for creating, updating, and managing projects and tasks.”
   • [claimed-docs] “The API reference has a complete guide on all our endpoints.”
   • [claimed-docs] “embed Motion's AI Calendar on your website so prospects can book your ideal time slots instantly.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal✓fullclaimed8/10

   SavvyCal docs explicitly describe webhooks for listening to account changes via HTTP POST, with HMAC-SHA256 signature verification and setup instructions via Settings > Integrations. Missing for 10: explicit enumeration of specific event types (booking created/rescheduled/canceled) and independent/hands-on confirmation of real-time delivery reliability.

   • [claimed-docs] “Webhooks allow you to listen for changes in a SavvyCal account and get notified via HTTP POST requests.”
   • [claimed-docs] “SavvyCal signs the request body with a SHA-256 HMAC signature. The signature is included in the x-savvycal-signature header.”
   • [claimed-docs] “SavvyCal signs the request body with a SHA-256 HMAC signature.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Navigate to Settings > Integrations and click the + icon in the Webhooks”
   • [claimed-docs] “We offer several ways to integrate with our product, including a REST API, webhooks, and a JavaScript embed library.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

2. developerA documented REST API lets me manage event types, availability, and bookings programmatically — enough to build scheduling into my own product

   weight 3 · round to SavvyCal
   Motion~partialclaimed4/10

   Motion documents a public API and reference/guides for creating and managing projects and tasks (motion-docs-1, motion-docs-29, motion-docs-2/28), showing a genuine developer API surface exists, but no evidence specifically confirms endpoints for event types, availability, or bookings — the scheduling/booking capability shown (docs-5/27) is an embeddable calendar widget, not documented as a programmatic API a developer could use to build booking into their own product. Missing for 10: explicit API endpoints/docs for event-type creation, availability rules, and booking management, plus any independent developer confirmation of using these endpoints.

   • [claimed-docs] “API access for creating, updating, and managing projects and tasks.”
   • [claimed-docs] “The API reference has a complete guide on all our endpoints.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Our cookbooks are a great place to get started for fully fleshed out examples!”
   • [claimed-docs] “Explore our guides and examples to integrate Motion.”
   • [claimed-docs] “embed Motion's AI Calendar on your website so prospects can book your ideal time slots instantly.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal~partialprobed6/10

   SavvyCal documents a REST API with OAuth2/personal-access-token auth and a 'SavvyCal Meetings API' plus webhooks and a JS embed library, indicating programmatic access to scheduling functionality. However, the evidence never specifies concrete endpoints for event types, availability, or bookings, and probes show no discoverable OpenAPI/swagger spec or llms.txt, leaving the exact API surface unconfirmed. Missing for 10: explicit endpoint/resource documentation for event types, availability, and bookings, and a machine-readable API spec (404s on openapi.json/swagger.json).

   • [claimed-docs] “The SavvyCal API adheres to REST conventions. Our API communicates in JSON format and uses OAuth access tokens to authenticate requests.”
   • [claimed-docs] “OAuth 2.0: OAuth2 ... HTTP: Bearer Auth ... Personal access token authentication”
   • [claimed-docs] “We offer several ways to integrate with our product, including a REST API, webhooks, and a JavaScript embed library.”
   • [claimed-docs] “OAuth 2.0: OAuth2 ... Personal access token authentication ... Bearer format: pt_secret_XXXXXXXXX”
   • [probe] “PROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://developers.savvycal.com/openapi.json, https://developers.savvycal.com/swagger.json, https://…”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

3. developerSelf-host the full scheduling engine from source or a container image under an open-source license

   weight 2 · round drawn
   Motion—none0/10

   The axis applies to this product kind (peer products hold positive or none verdicts on this story), so lack of evidence for an applicable capability is "none", never "na". (na/none harmonized at arena bring-up — see pipeline/scripts/na-harmonize.ts.)

   ⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   SavvyCal is a hosted SaaS scheduling product; evidence shows only a REST API, webhooks, and JS embed for integration, with a page listing 'open-source contributions' but no self-hostable engine, source release, or container image. No evidence of any self-hosting capability under an open-source license.

   • [claimed-docs] “Here are some of our contributions to the community”
   • [claimed-docs] “We offer several ways to integrate with our product, including a REST API, webhooks, and a JavaScript embed library.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

Embeds

1. sales leadBookings flow into my CRM and automation stack (Salesforce, HubSpot, Zapier) without manual copying

   weight 2 · round to SavvyCal
   Motion~partialclaimed4/10

   Motion documents a public API for tasks/projects and a Zapier integration that could theoretically bridge to CRMs, but there is no direct evidence of native Salesforce/HubSpot connectors or of booking data flowing automatically into a CRM without manual setup. missing for 10: native Salesforce/HubSpot integration docs, concrete example of booking-to-CRM automation, independent confirmation the Zapier path works reliably for this use case.

   • [claimed-docs] “Connect with thousands of the most popular apps using Zapier.”
   • [claimed-docs] “API access for creating, updating, and managing projects and tasks.”
   • [claimed-docs] “The API reference has a complete guide on all our endpoints.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Say goodbye to siloed project management tools.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal~partialclaimed6/10

   SavvyCal explicitly supports Zapier for CRM syncing and workflow automations (create/update CRM records), plus webhooks and a REST API for custom integrations, which together enable bookings to flow into CRM/automation stacks without manual copying. However, there is no evidence of native, first-party Salesforce or HubSpot integrations — only generic Zapier and webhook/API-based paths, which require setup/configuration rather than a turnkey connection. Missing for 10: dedicated Salesforce/HubSpot native integrations, documented pre-built Zaps or CRM field-mapping templates, and independent case studies confirming reliable no-manual-copy CRM sync in practice.

   • [claimed-docs] “Trigger no-code automations with Zapier ... Sync with your CRM, send yourself reminders, create project management to-do’s…the sky’s the lim…”
   • [claimed-docs] “Create or update CRM records, send yourself reminders, or create to-do’s in your project management software.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Trigger no-code automations with Zapier Sync with your CRM, send yourself reminders, create project management to-do’s…the sky’s the limit.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Webhooks allow you to listen for changes in a SavvyCal account and get notified via HTTP POST requests.”
   • [claimed-docs] “We offer several ways to integrate with our product, including a REST API, webhooks, and a JavaScript embed library.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

2. developerEmbed the booking experience in my own site — inline, popup, or floating widget — with a documented snippet

   weight 2 · round to SavvyCal
   Motion~partialclaimed3/10

   Motion's marketing pages mention embedding the AI Calendar on a website so prospects can book time slots, but there's no evidence of a documented snippet, nor of inline/popup/floating widget modes. missing for 10: actual embed code/snippet documentation, confirmation of multiple embed modes (inline, popup, floating), and any developer-facing integration guide beyond a marketing claim.

   • [claimed-docs] “embed Motion's AI Calendar on your website so prospects can book your ideal time slots instantly.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Share your schedule anywhere—embed Motion's AI Calendar on your website so prospects can book your ideal time slots instantly.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal✓fullclaimed8/10

   SavvyCal documents a JavaScript embed library supporting inline, popover, and floating widget embeds, plus hyperlink/JS-call triggers, matching the story closely (savvycal-docs-2, savvycal-docs-18, savvycal-docs-49, savvycal-docs-52). Missing for 10: a directly-quoted code snippet in the evidence pack and independent/hands-on confirmation of the embed working on a third-party site.

   • [claimed-docs] “Our JavaScript library allows you to embed your scheduling links on your website (both inline and as a popover).”
   • [claimed-docs] “Display scheduling links inline, via a floating widget, or triggered based clicking a hyperlink.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Let visitors schedule time without ever leaving your website. Trigger your embedded link via hyperlink, the floating button, or a JavaScript…”
   • [claimed-docs] “We offer several ways to integrate with our product, including a REST API, webhooks, and a JavaScript embed library.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

Workflows

1. sales leadAutomated reminder and follow-up sequences (email/SMS) fire around every booking to cut no-shows

   weight 2 · round to SavvyCal
   Motion~partialclaimed3/10

   Motion's meeting templates support configurable 'reminders' alongside durations and pre-meeting questions, implying some automated reminder capability tied to bookings, but there is no evidence of SMS reminders, multi-step follow-up sequences, or any explicit no-show-reduction framing. missing for 10: SMS reminder channel, explicit follow-up sequence automation, no-show reduction metrics/claims, and independent confirmation the reminders actually fire around bookings.

   • [claimed-docs] “Build a template for every scenario. Client calls, board meetings, team all hands, sales demos—create a custom template for each with specif…”
   • [claimed-docs] “Connect instantly with zero setup. Video conferencing links are automatically added to every meeting, eliminating the pre-meeting scramble f…”
   • [claimed-docs] “AI Meeting Notetaker Takes perfect notes and follows-up with action items for you”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal~partialclaimed6/10

   SavvyCal's Workflows feature explicitly supports sending customized 'meeting lifecycle messages' with adjustable timing and content designed 'to minimize no-shows,' plus Zapier integration for further automation (e.g., SMS via third-party apps). However, native SMS reminders are not documented—only email-based workflow messages and templates are described, with SMS presumably requiring Zapier/CRM integration rather than being built-in. missing for 10: native SMS reminder capability, evidence of automatic sequencing/multi-touch cadence beyond single reminders, independent confirmation of no-show reduction impact.

   • [claimed-docs] “It’s never been easier to send customized meeting lifecycle messages and automate manual tasks with SavvyCal workflows.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Attach workflows to one or more links to save yourself from repetitive work.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Keep your automations neatly organized with powerful multi-action workflows.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Customize your timing and content to minimize no-shows. Compose from scratch or pick one of our handy templates.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Customize the timing and content of your reminders to increase attendance. Compose from scratch or pick one of our handy templates.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Trigger no-code automations with Zapier ... Sync with your CRM, send yourself reminders, create project management to-do’s…the sky’s the lim…”
   • [claimed-docs] “Trigger no-code automations with Zapier Sync with your CRM, send yourself reminders, create project management to-do’s…the sky’s the limit.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

2. founderInvitees can reschedule or cancel from their confirmation, with my policies enforced and calendars updated everywhere

   weight 2 · round drawn
   Motion—none0/10

   Evidence covers Motion's meeting booking/embedding and daily meeting limits, but nothing describes invitee-facing reschedule/cancel flows from a confirmation email, policy enforcement on those actions, or cross-calendar sync of such changes.

   • [claimed-docs] “embed Motion's AI Calendar on your website so prospects can book your ideal time slots instantly.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Set daily limits and watch Motion enforce them automatically. When you hit your threshold, your calendar becomes unbookable—no more accident…”
   • [claimed-docs] “Share your schedule anywhere—embed Motion's AI Calendar on your website so prospects can book your ideal time slots instantly.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Put a cap on meeting overload. Set daily limits and watch Motion enforce them automatically.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   The evidence pack contains no mention of invitee-initiated rescheduling or cancellation from a confirmation, nor any statement about policy enforcement or calendar sync on such changes. While this is a plausible feature for a scheduling product like SavvyCal, no documentation, webhook event, or feature page in the pack addresses it. Missing for 10: any mention of reschedule/cancel links in confirmations, policy enforcement on changes, or calendar update propagation across all attendees.

   ⚑ flag

3. founderEvery booking gets a video conference link automatically (Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, or native video)

   weight 2 · round to Motion
   Motion✓fullclaimed8/10

   Motion's docs explicitly state video conferencing links are auto-added to every meeting with zero setup, and mentions Zoom/Meet/Teams integration for turning meetings into tasks, implying support across these platforms. Missing for 10: independent/hands-on confirmation of native video option and explicit per-platform setup details beyond vendor claims.

   • [claimed-docs] “Connect instantly with zero setup. Video conferencing links are automatically added to every meeting, eliminating the pre-meeting scramble f…”
   • [claimed-docs] “turn Zoom/Meet/Teams meetings or Slack/Teams messages into tasks, or tell Siri to add tasks via voice command.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Combine all your calendars in one view. Turn all of your calendar accounts—Outlook, Google, iCloud—into one single interface.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal~partialclaimed5/10

   Evidence shows automatic video link creation for specific providers (Zoom rooms, Google Meet links, Whereby rooms) tied to round-robin scheduling, implying similar support elsewhere, but there's no explicit mention of Teams integration or a general 'native video' option, and no confirmation this applies uniformly to all booking types beyond round-robin links. missing for 10: Microsoft Teams video link support, native/built-in video conferencing option, and confirmation this auto-generation applies to all booking link types (not just round-robin).

   • [claimed-docs] “Automatically create unique Zoom rooms for new events.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Add Meet links to your Google Calendar events.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Attach Whereby meeting rooms to calendar invites.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

1. ai-native userDo everything through the API that I can do in the UI

   weight 2 · round to Motion
   Motion~partialclaimed4/10

   Motion has a documented API for creating/updating projects and tasks with a reference and cookbooks, but the evidence pack shows no indication that core UI capabilities like AI auto-scheduling, meeting assistant, workflow builder, or project alerts are exposed via API endpoints. Missing for 10: explicit API coverage for AI scheduling/calendar automation, meeting booking, workflow builder, and project alerting, plus any independent confirmation of API-UI parity.

   • [claimed-docs] “API access for creating, updating, and managing projects and tasks.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Explore our guides and examples to integrate Motion.”
   • [claimed-docs] “The API reference has a complete guide on all our endpoints.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal~partialprobed3/10

   SavvyCal ships a documented REST API, OAuth/personal-access-token auth, webhooks, and a JS embed library, showing genuine API-based access to core scheduling functions, but there is no evidence the API covers the full breadth of UI features (round-robin, meeting polls, workflows, Stripe payment links, custom branding) and probes for an OpenAPI spec/llms.txt both 404, suggesting incomplete or undocumented API surface parity. missing for 10: evidence that advanced UI features (round robin, polls, workflows, payments, branding) are fully exposed via API, a public OpenAPI/schema reference, and independent confirmation of parity.

   • [claimed-docs] “The SavvyCal API adheres to REST conventions. Our API communicates in JSON format and uses OAuth access tokens to authenticate requests.”
   • [claimed-docs] “We offer several ways to integrate with our product, including a REST API, webhooks, and a JavaScript embed library.”
   • [claimed-docs] “OAuth 2.0: OAuth2 ... HTTP: Bearer Auth ... Personal access token authentication”
   • [probe] “PROBE llms.txt: HTTP 404 at https://developers.savvycal.com/llms.txt”
   • [probe] “PROBE openapi: all candidate paths 404 (https://developers.savvycal.com/openapi.json, https://developers.savvycal.com/swagger.json, https://…”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

2. ai-native userExport all of my data in open formats and leave

   weight 3 · round drawn
   Motion—none0/10

   Evidence shows Motion has an API for creating/updating tasks and projects, but there is no mention of bulk data export, open format exports (CSV/JSON dumps), or account-portability/data-takeout features for users wanting to leave the platform. missing for 10: bulk export functionality, open-format data export (CSV/JSON), documented data portability/account closure export process.

   • [claimed-docs] “API access for creating, updating, and managing projects and tasks.”
   • [claimed-docs] “The API reference has a complete guide on all our endpoints.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   There is no evidence of a bulk data export feature or open-format data portability (e.g., CSV/JSON export of bookings, contacts, workflows) that would let a user take all their data and leave; the API exists for integration, not for full data export, and no explicit export/GDPR-style data-download feature is documented.

   ⚑ flag

3. ai-native userRead the product's source under an open license

   weight 2 · round drawn
   Motion—none0/10

   The axis applies to this product kind (peer products hold positive or none verdicts on this story), so lack of evidence for an applicable capability is "none", never "na". (na/none harmonized at arena bring-up — see pipeline/scripts/na-harmonize.ts.)

   ⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   SavvyCal is a closed proprietary SaaS scheduling product; the only related evidence is a page mentioning unspecified 'contributions to the community,' not the product's own source code under an open license.

   • [claimed-docs] “Here are some of our contributions to the community”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

4. ai-native userSelf-host the core product

   weight 3 · round drawn
   Motion—none0/10

   The axis applies to this product kind (peer products hold positive or none verdicts on this story), so lack of evidence for an applicable capability is "none", never "na". (na/none harmonized at arena bring-up — see pipeline/scripts/na-harmonize.ts.)

   ⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   SavvyCal is a hosted SaaS scheduling product with no evidence of a self-hostable core; only an 'open-source contributions' page is mentioned, not a self-hostable server offering.

   • [claimed-docs] “Here are some of our contributions to the community”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

Pricing

1. founderThe free tier covers real individual scheduling — a usable booking link without a paid plan

   weight 2 · round drawn
   Motion—none0/10

   The evidence pack shows only paid pricing tiers (e.g., credits/seat/month, 'Business AI for power users') and no mention of a free plan or a booking-link feature available without payment; nothing indicates a usable free scheduling/booking capability.

   • [claimed-docs] “For power users and businesses with complex needs”
   • [claimed-docs] “Business AI For power users and businesses with complex needs”
   • [claimed-docs] “15,000 credits/seat/month”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   The evidence pack contains no mention of a free tier, free plan details, or what a basic booking link includes without payment; only feature and API docs are present, with no pricing-plan breakdown. Missing for 10: any documentation of a free plan's scope/limits, evidence that a usable booking link exists without payment, and confirmation of no-cost individual scheduling.

   ⚑ flag

2. founderPublished per-seat pricing tells me exactly what each tier costs and includes before I talk to sales

   weight 1 · round to Motion
   Motion~partialclaimed4/10

   The pricing page evidence lists tier names (e.g., 'Business AI'), feature bullets (Gantt charts, time tracking, permissions, dashboards) and a usage detail ('15,000 credits/seat/month'), showing Motion does publish some tiered, per-seat plan information. However no evidence pack item shows actual dollar prices per seat/tier, so it's unclear the pricing is fully transparent before talking to sales. Missing for 10: explicit per-tier dollar pricing, seat-cost breakdown, and confirmation no 'contact sales' gating exists for upper tiers.

   • [claimed-docs] “For power users and businesses with complex needs”
   • [claimed-docs] “Business AI For power users and businesses with complex needs”
   • [claimed-docs] “15,000 credits/seat/month”
   • [claimed-docs] “Timeline & Gantt Charts”
   • [claimed-docs] “Time Tracking”
   • [claimed-docs] “Team Capacity Planning”
   • [claimed-docs] “Permissions & Access Control”
   • [claimed-docs] “Advanced Dashboards & Reports”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   No evidence pack items reference pricing tiers, per-seat cost, or plan feature comparisons; only savvycal.com/pricing is mentioned once in passing (docs-59) without any pricing details. This is an applicable axis for a SaaS scheduling product, but no evidence shows published per-seat pricing.

   ⚑ flag

1. ai-native userChoose where my data is stored (region/residency)

   weight 2 · round drawn
   Motion—none0/10

   No evidence in the pack addresses data residency, regional storage options, or compliance controls for where data is stored; Motion's docs focus on scheduling, tasks, and API features only.

   ⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   No evidence anywhere in the pack of data residency options, regional storage selection, or data localization controls for SavvyCal; the evidence covers scheduling features and API auth only.

   ⚑ flag

2. ai-native userPrevent my data from being used to train AI models

   weight 3 · round drawn
   Motion—none0/10

   No evidence in the pack addresses data usage for AI training opt-out or any privacy controls regarding model training; all evidence covers scheduling/task/API features and unrelated engineering discussions.

   ⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   No evidence in the pack addresses AI training data usage, opt-out controls, or any privacy policy statement regarding AI model training; SavvyCal is a scheduling product and this specific privacy commitment is unevidenced.

   ⚑ flag

3. ai-native userControl data retention and deletion

   weight 2 · round drawn
   Motion—none0/10

   The evidence pack contains no mention of data retention policies, deletion controls, export/erasure tools, or privacy/compliance settings for Motion. As a SaaS productivity tool handling user task/calendar data, this axis clearly applies, but there is no documentation or community evidence showing such controls exist.

   ⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   No evidence found addressing data retention policies, deletion controls, or privacy/data lifecycle management for SavvyCal; the evidence pack covers scheduling features, API auth, and webhooks only.

   ⚑ flag

4. ai-native userOpt out of telemetry and usage tracking

   weight 2 · round drawn
   Motion—none0/10

   No evidence in the pack addresses telemetry, usage tracking, or opt-out controls for Motion; all docs focus on scheduling/task/project features and unrelated engineering blog discussions.

   ⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   No evidence pack items mention telemetry, usage tracking, analytics opt-out, or privacy controls of this kind; SavvyCal's docs focus on API/webhooks/scheduling features only.

   ⚑ flag

Teams

1. sales leadOffer collective events that only show slots when every required host is free

   weight 2 · round to SavvyCal
   Motion—none0/10

   No evidence describes collective/multi-host scheduling (i.e., booking links that only surface slots when all required hosts are free); the docs only cover single-host AI calendar booking, meeting assistant templates, and task scheduling. This is a plausible axis for a scheduling product, but nothing in the pack shows a collective-event or team-availability-intersection feature.

   ⚑ flag

   SavvyCal✓fullclaimed8/10

   SavvyCal explicitly documents collective scheduling links that show combined availability across multiple teammates, only surfacing slots where the whole group is free ('Show combined availability for you and any number of teammates that allow recipients to book a time with your selected group'; 'Combine your availability with multiple colleagues on scheduling links'), distinct from its round-robin (any-available-host) mode. Missing for 10: independent/hands-on corroboration beyond vendor marketing pages and explicit confirmation of 'required host' logic vs optional overlay.

   • [claimed-docs] “Show combined availability for you and any number of teammates that allow recipients to book a time with your selected group.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Combine your availability with multiple colleagues on scheduling links.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Show collective availability to book any available team member.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Show combined availability for your whole team and automatically route each booked meeting to the right person.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

2. sales leadInbound meetings distribute across my team round-robin, with weighting or priority so load stays fair

   weight 2 · round to SavvyCal
   Motion—none0/10

   Motion offers individual AI calendar booking pages and team capacity planning, but there is no evidence of round-robin distribution of inbound meetings across a team, nor any weighting/priority logic for balancing sales lead load.

   ⚑ flag

   SavvyCal~partialclaimed6/10

   SavvyCal has dedicated round-robin/pooling features that distribute meetings across team members either by cycling (equal distribution) or random selection for max availability, explicitly marketed for sales use cases. However, there is no evidence of configurable weighting or priority levels among team members (e.g., unequal load ratios) beyond binary equal/random distribution. Missing for 10: explicit weighted/priority-based distribution controls, admin-configurable ratios per rep, and independent confirmation of fairness enforcement over time.

   • [claimed-docs] “Show combined availability for your whole team and automatically route each booked meeting to the right person.”
   • [claimed-docs] “The choice is yours — randomly select who the meeting gets booked with for maximum availability or cycle through team members for equal dist…”
   • [claimed-docs] “Automatically distribute meetings across team members fairly.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Round robin pooling Automatically distribute meetings across team members fairly.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Distribute meetings across a pool of organizers. Perfect for sales and customer support.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Team members can set custom availability for each round robin scheduling link or default to their preset work hours.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag

3. sales leadA routing form qualifies invitees and sends them to the right person or team based on their answers

   weight 1 · round drawn
   Motion—none0/10

   The axis applies to this product kind (peer products hold positive or none verdicts on this story), so lack of evidence for an applicable capability is "none", never "na". (na/none harmonized at arena bring-up — see pipeline/scripts/na-harmonize.ts.)

   ⚑ flag

   SavvyCal—none0/10

   SavvyCal documents round-robin and collective team scheduling that automatically distributes meetings across team members, but there is no evidence of a routing/qualification form that asks invitees questions and branches them to different people or teams based on their answers. Missing for 10: any mention of conditional routing forms, question-based qualification logic, or answer-driven assignment to specific reps/teams.

   • [claimed-docs] “Show combined availability for your whole team and automatically route each booked meeting to the right person.”
   • [claimed-docs] “The choice is yours — randomly select who the meeting gets booked with for maximum availability or cycle through team members for equal dist…”
   • [claimed-docs] “Automatically distribute meetings across team members fairly.”
   • [claimed-docs] “Distribute meetings across a pool of organizers. Perfect for sales and customer support.”

   proof ↗⚑ flag