Rank #1 of 8 in LLM Evals & Observability
Install
Showcase


Verified integrations
Connections to other tracked products — hover a chip for the verbatim evidence quote behind it.
By theme — the product's score on each story themeBy theme
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticnessevidence →
How well agents can access and operate the product
Alerting dashboards — stories about alerting dashboards in this arenaAlerting dashboardsevidence →
Stories about alerting dashboards in this arena
Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depthevidence →
How much of the product can run unattended
Cost monitoring — stories about cost monitoring in this arenaCost monitoringevidence →
Stories about cost monitoring in this arena
Data access export — stories about data access export in this arenaData access exportevidence →
Stories about data access export in this arena
Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasetsevidence →
Measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression tracking
Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpennessevidence →
Open source, data portability, and self-hosting stories
Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy postureevidence →
Data-handling and privacy stories
Prompt management — stories about prompt management in this arenaPrompt managementevidence →
Stories about prompt management in this arena
Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentationevidence →
Instrumenting code and tracing requests end to end
Story verdicts — every judged story with its evidenceStory verdicts
Follow the green: where the map greys out is where Braintrust stops today. ✓ full · ~ partial · ! disputed · — none · n/a not applicable.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness
How well agents can access and operate the product
API surface
Drive the product through a documented public API
✓8/10
unlocks → Webhooks · Scoped API keys · Machine-readable spec · Versioning policy
Subscribe to events via webhooks
—–
Build against official SDKs
✓8/10
Issue scoped/least-privilege API credentials for an agent
—0/10
Connect an agent via an official MCP server
✓8/10
Download a machine-readable API spec (OpenAPI or equivalent)
—0/10
Rely on versioned APIs with a documented deprecation policy
—0/10
Test against a sandbox environment without touching production data
~4/10
Explore an interactive API reference with runnable examples
—0/10
Docs for agents
Point an agent at llms.txt or agent-oriented docs
~6/10
Agentic features
Delegate tasks to a built-in AI assistant inside the product
✓7/10
unlocks → MCP client
Operate the product with natural-language commands
✓8/10
Plug MCP servers into this product so it can use their tools
—0/10
Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the product
✓8/10
Set up automations that run autonomously in the background
~6/10
Alerting dashboards — stories about alerting dashboards in this arenaAlerting dashboards
Stories about alerting dashboards in this arena
Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depth
How much of the product can run unattended
Cost monitoring — stories about cost monitoring in this arenaCost monitoring
Stories about cost monitoring in this arena
Data access export — stories about data access export in this arenaData access export
Stories about data access export in this arena
Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets
Measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression tracking
Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpenness
Open source, data portability, and self-hosting stories
Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy posture
Data-handling and privacy stories
Prompt management — stories about prompt management in this arenaPrompt management
Stories about prompt management in this arena
Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation
Instrumenting code and tracing requests end to end
Have an agent query my traces, metrics, and eval results through an API or MCP server to debug my app
✓9/10
Mask or redact sensitive data before it is stored in traces
—–
Instrument apps in both Python and JS/TS with officially supported SDKs
~6/10
Sorted by importance (agentic first) (high → low) · 52/52 stories · click a row’s chevron for the rationale and evidence
Connect an agent via an official MCP server G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 3 | full | 8/10 | Tprobed | |
Drive the product through a documented public API G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 3 | full | 8/10 | Tprobed | |
Delegate tasks to a built-in AI assistant inside the product G Agentic features | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 3 | full | 7/10 | Cclaimed | |
Plug MCP servers into this product so it can use their tools G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 3 | none | 0/10 | ||
Run the product headlessly / in CI for automation G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | full | 9/10 | Tprobed | |
Use an official CLI G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | full | 9/10 | Tprobed | |
Build against official SDKs G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | full | 8/10 | Tprobed | |
Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the product G Agentic features | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | full | 8/10 | Cclaimed | |
Operate the product with natural-language commands G Agentic features | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | full | 8/10 | Tprobed | |
Point an agent at llms.txt or agent-oriented docs G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | partial± | 6/10 | Tprobed | |
Set up automations that run autonomously in the background G Agentic features | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | partial± | 6/10 | Cclaimed | |
Download a machine-readable API spec (OpenAPI or equivalent) G Api quality | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | none | 0/10 | ||
Explore an interactive API reference with runnable examples G Api quality | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | none | 0/10 | ||
Issue scoped/least-privilege API credentials for an agent G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | none | 0/10 | ||
Rely on versioned APIs with a documented deprecation policy G Api quality | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | none | 0/10 | ||
Subscribe to events via webhooks G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
Test against a sandbox environment without touching production data G Api quality | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 1 | partial | 4/10 | Cclaimed | |
Compare eval runs side by side to catch regressions between prompt or model versions C Offline evals | ml engineer | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 3 | full | 9/10 | Cclaimed | |
Curate datasets from production traces and run offline evaluations against them C Offline evals | ml engineer | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 3 | full | 9/10 | Cclaimed | |
Have an agent query my traces, metrics, and eval results through an API or MCP server to debug my app C Ai observability | ai-native user | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 3 | full | 9/10 | Tprobed | |
Capture traces of my LLM calls with inputs, outputs, latency, and token usage C Trace capture | developer | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 3 | full | 8/10 | Cclaimed | |
Score outputs with configurable LLM-as-a-judge evaluators C Offline evals | ml engineer | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 3 | full | 8/10 | Cclaimed | |
Self-host the core product G | ai-native user | Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpenness | 3 | partial | 6/10 | Cclaimed | |
Version prompts and deploy changes to production without shipping code C Prompt workflow | developer | Prompt management — stories about prompt management in this arenaPrompt management | 3 | partial | 6/10 | Cclaimed | |
Define rules that trigger actions automatically on events G | ai-native user | Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depth | 3 | partial | 5/10 | Cclaimed | |
Export all of my data in open formats and leave G | ai-native user | Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpenness | 3 | partial | 5/10 | Cclaimed | |
See cost and token usage per request, model, and time period in dashboards C Cost tracking | developer | Cost monitoring — stories about cost monitoring in this arenaCost monitoring | 3 | partial | 5/10 | Cclaimed | |
Prevent my data from being used to train AI models G | ai-native user | Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy posture | 3 | none | untested | none yet | |
Send and receive traces over OpenTelemetry (OTLP) instead of a proprietary format C Trace capture | developer | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 3 | none | untested | none yet | |
Have an agent create a dataset, trigger an eval run programmatically, and read back the results C Ai eval ops | ai-native user | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 2 | full | 8/10 | Cclaimed | |
Iterate on prompts in a playground against real models and variables C Prompt workflow | developer | Prompt management — stories about prompt management in this arenaPrompt management | 2 | full | 8/10 | Cclaimed | |
Run evals in CI and gate deployments on their results C Offline evals | developer | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 2 | full | 8/10 | Cclaimed | |
Run evaluators continuously on live production traffic, not just offline datasets C Online evals | ml engineer | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 2 | full | 8/10 | Cclaimed | |
Write custom code-based scorers and metrics for my evaluations C Offline evals | ml engineer | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 2 | full | 8/10 | Cclaimed | |
Do everything through the API that I can do in the UI G | ai-native user | Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpenness | 2 | partial | 7/10 | Tprobed | |
Perform bulk operations across many items at once G | ai-native user | Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depth | 2 | full | 7/10 | Cclaimed | |
Choose where my data is stored (region/residency) G | ai-native user | Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy posture | 2 | partial | 6/10 | Cclaimed | |
Instrument apps in both Python and JS/TS with officially supported SDKs G Sdk coverage | developer | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 2 | partial | 6/10 | Cclaimed | |
Trace multi-step agent runs as nested spans grouped into sessions or threads C Trace capture | developer | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 2 | partial | 6/10 | Cclaimed | |
Build custom dashboards over latency, error, cost, and eval-score metrics C Monitoring | ml engineer | Alerting dashboards — stories about alerting dashboards in this arenaAlerting dashboards | 2 | partial | 5/10 | Cclaimed | |
Bulk-export traces and datasets to blob storage or my data warehouse C Data export | developer | Data access export — stories about data access export in this arenaData access export | 2 | partial | 5/10 | Cclaimed | |
Route outputs to human annotation queues for review and labeling C Human review | ml engineer | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 2 | partial | 5/10 | Cclaimed | |
Schedule recurring jobs or workflows G | ai-native user | Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depth | 2 | partial | 5/10 | Cclaimed | |
Attribute cost and usage to users, sessions, and features via custom metadata C Cost tracking | developer | Cost monitoring — stories about cost monitoring in this arenaCost monitoring | 2 | partial | 4/10 | Cclaimed | |
Control data retention and deletion G | ai-native user | Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy posture | 2 | partial | 4/10 | Cclaimed | |
Instrument my app through existing integrations for frameworks like LangChain, the OpenAI SDK, or the Vercel AI SDK C Trace capture | developer | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 2 | partial | 4/10 | Xcommunity | |
Read the product's source under an open license G | ai-native user | Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpenness | 2 | none | 0/10 | ||
Mask or redact sensitive data before it is stored in traces C Data controls | developer | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
Opt out of telemetry and usage tracking G | ai-native user | Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy posture | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
Set alerts on error rates, cost spikes, or eval-score drops and get notified in Slack, PagerDuty, or email C Monitoring | developer | Alerting dashboards — stories about alerting dashboards in this arenaAlerting dashboards | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
Version, review, and roll back my automations G | ai-native user | Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depth | 1 | partial | 5/10 | Cclaimed | |
Capture multimodal payloads (images, audio, files) inside my traces C Trace capture | developer | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 1 | none | 0/10 |
Opportunities — the stories that would move this product's scores, from its own judged verdictsOpportunitiestop 8 of 33 stories with headroom
What would move Braintrust’s scores — derived from its own judged verdicts, biggest headroom first. Each line quotes what the judge found missing; shipping it (or evidencing it publicly) is the fix.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productPlug MCP servers into this product so it can use their tools
nonemoves agent-readyimpact 45
All MCP evidence describes Braintrust exposing an MCP server that other clients (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex) connect to in order to use Braintrust's tools — the reverse of this story, which asks whether Braintrust can consume external MCP servers' tools.
Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endSend and receive traces over OpenTelemetry (OTLP) instead of a proprietary format
nonemoves PA Scoreimpact 30
Missing: any mention of OTLP endpoint, OpenTelemetry SDK compatibility, or OTel collector integration.
Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrevent my data from being used to train AI models
nonemoves PA Scoreimpact 30
Missing: any explicit no-training-on-customer-data policy, opt-out controls, or terms-of-service statement about AI training use.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productIssue scoped/least-privilege API credentials for an agent
nonemoves agent-readyimpact 30
The evidence describes Braintrust's general API, CLI, and MCP integrations but contains no mention of scoped, role-based, or least-privilege API key/credential issuance for agents; the only security-related item is a breach report telling customers to rotate keys, which does not demonstrate a scoping/least-privilege capability.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productSubscribe to events via webhooks
nonemoves agent-readyimpact 30
No evidence in the pack mentions webhooks or any event-subscription mechanism; Braintrust's documented interfaces are API, CLI, MCP server, and UI, none of which are shown to support webhook subscriptions.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productExplore an interactive API reference with runnable examples
nonemoves API qualityimpact 30
Missing: evidence of an interactive API console, runnable code snippets embedded in the reference, or a machine-readable OpenAPI spec powering such interactivity.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productDownload a machine-readable API spec (OpenAPI or equivalent)
nonemoves API qualityimpact 30
Braintrust documents a REST API (api-reference) but explicit probes for OpenAPI/swagger specs at all standard paths returned 404, and no docs mention a downloadable machine-readable spec.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productRely on versioned APIs with a documented deprecation policy
nonemoves API qualityimpact 30
Missing: versioning scheme documentation, explicit deprecation policy, changelog/migration guides.
Showing the top 8 of 33 — every none/partial verdict in the story verdicts table is headroom.
Think a verdict is wrong? Every verdicts-table row has a Flag link — see the methodology.
Coverage map — which docs area, API section, or community source covers which judged storiesCoverage map6 surfaces · 39 covered stories
Where the cited evidence behind each covered verdict came from — the same citations the verdicts table shows, no extra judging.
docs39 stories
- Point an agent at llms.txt or agent-oriented docs
- Run the product headlessly / in CI for automation
- Connect an agent via an official MCP server
- Use an official CLI
- Drive the product through a documented public API
- Build against official SDKs
- Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the product
- Set up automations that run autonomously in the background
- Delegate tasks to a built-in AI assistant inside the product
- Operate the product with natural-language commands
- Test against a sandbox environment without touching production data
- Build custom dashboards over latency, error, cost, and eval-score metrics
- Perform bulk operations across many items at once
- Define rules that trigger actions automatically on events
- Schedule recurring jobs or workflows
- Version, review, and roll back my automations
- Attribute cost and usage to users, sessions, and features via custom metadata
- See cost and token usage per request, model, and time period in dashboards
- Bulk-export traces and datasets to blob storage or my data warehouse
- Have an agent create a dataset, trigger an eval run programmatically, and read back the results
- Route outputs to human annotation queues for review and labeling
- Run evals in CI and gate deployments on their results
- Write custom code-based scorers and metrics for my evaluations
- Compare eval runs side by side to catch regressions between prompt or model versions
- Score outputs with configurable LLM-as-a-judge evaluators
- Curate datasets from production traces and run offline evaluations against them
- Run evaluators continuously on live production traffic, not just offline datasets
- Do everything through the API that I can do in the UI
- Export all of my data in open formats and leave
- Self-host the core product
- Choose where my data is stored (region/residency)
- Control data retention and deletion
- Iterate on prompts in a playground against real models and variables
- Version prompts and deploy changes to production without shipping code
- Have an agent query my traces, metrics, and eval results through an API or MCP server to debug my app
- Instrument apps in both Python and JS/TS with officially supported SDKs
- Trace multi-step agent runs as nested spans grouped into sessions or threads
- Instrument my app through existing integrations for frameworks like LangChain, the OpenAI SDK, or the Vercel AI SDK
- Capture traces of my LLM calls with inputs, outputs, latency, and token usage
GitHub README9 stories
- Run the product headlessly / in CI for automation
- Build against official SDKs
- Have an agent create a dataset, trigger an eval run programmatically, and read back the results
- Run evals in CI and gate deployments on their results
- Write custom code-based scorers and metrics for my evaluations
- Score outputs with configurable LLM-as-a-judge evaluators
- Curate datasets from production traces and run offline evaluations against them
- Instrument apps in both Python and JS/TS with officially supported SDKs
- Capture traces of my LLM calls with inputs, outputs, latency, and token usage
OpenAPI spec3 stories
braintrust.dev3 stories
Hacker News2 stories
Claims vs evidence — vendor claims reconciled against independent verdictsClaims vs evidence
7 of 24 testable claims verified · 1 contradicted → integrity 21/100
28 distinct capability claims found in Braintrust’s own claimed-docs/GitHub materials, reconciled against our judge’s independent verdicts.
7
Verified
16
Unverified
1
Contradicted
16
Undersold
Verified (11)
“Loop is an AI agent that understands your data structure so you can query logs via natural language”
Operate the product with natural-language commandsfullproof ↗
“Install the bt CLI to set up, instrument, and run Braintrust with your coding agent”
“Query logs, author prompts/scorers, configure monitoring, and run evals from MCP-compatible clients like Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, VS Code”
Have an agent query my traces, metrics, and eval results through an API or MCP server to debug my appfullproof ↗
“Braintrust API allows programmatic interaction with all aspects of the platform”
Drive the product through a documented public APIfullproof ↗
“Braintrust API allows programmatic interaction with all aspects of the platform”
Do everything through the API that I can do in the UIpartialproof ↗
“Browse traces and spans in the UI or terminal via bt view logs”
“Integrate with AI providers and frameworks to send traces to Braintrust”
Instrument my app through existing integrations for frameworks like LangChain, the OpenAI SDK, or the Vercel AI SDKpartialproof ↗
“Supports diagnosing why a single complex trace went wrong”
Have an agent query my traces, metrics, and eval results through an API or MCP server to debug my appfullproof ↗
“bt CLI lets you authenticate, trace coding-agent sessions, run evals, browse/query logs, sync data, manage functions from terminal”
“bt CLI lets you authenticate, trace coding-agent sessions, run evals, browse/query logs, sync data, manage functions from terminal”
Run the product headlessly / in CI for automationfullproof ↗
“bt CLI can create/manage projects, experiments, datasets; log traces/metrics; manage prompts, tools, scorers”
Unverified (24)
“Captures detailed traces including inputs, outputs, model params, latency, token usage, metadata”
Capture traces of my LLM calls with inputs, outputs, latency, and token usagefullproof ↗
“Run evals automatically on every pull request in CI/CD to catch regressions”
Run evals in CI and gate deployments on their resultsfullproof ↗
“No-code playground for iterating on prompts, models, scorers, datasets with real-time eval runs and side-by-side comparison”
Iterate on prompts in a playground against real models and variablesfullproof ↗
“No-code playground for iterating on prompts, models, scorers, datasets with real-time eval runs and side-by-side comparison”
Compare eval runs side by side to catch regressions between prompt or model versionsfullproof ↗
“Online scoring evaluates production traces automatically as they're logged, asynchronously with no latency impact”
Run evaluators continuously on live production traffic, not just offline datasetsfullproof ↗
“Build datasets from production logs, user feedback, manual curation, or auto-generate with Loop”
Curate datasets from production traces and run offline evaluations against themfullproof ↗
“Loop is an AI agent that understands your data structure so you can query logs via natural language”
Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the productfullproof ↗
“Patterns runs Loop on a schedule over trace backlog to find recurring issues and suggest fixes”
Set up automations that run autonomously in the backgroundpartialproof ↗
“Self-hosted deployment lets you control infrastructure storing sensitive data while Braintrust manages UI, auth, and updates”
“Build custom annotation interfaces tailored to your team's review workflow”
Route outputs to human annotation queues for review and labelingpartialproof ↗
“Define custom business dimensions (use case, segment, compliance, tone) and Topics continuously clusters every trace against them”
Build custom dashboards over latency, error, cost, and eval-score metricspartialproof ↗
“Add tracing to capture LLM calls, application logic, and user feedback as foundation for observability/eval”
Capture traces of my LLM calls with inputs, outputs, latency, and token usagefullproof ↗
“Measure and improve AI application quality with playgrounds and evals”
Iterate on prompts in a playground against real models and variablesfullproof ↗
“Ask the built-in AI agent to investigate data and build scorers, datasets, dashboards”
Delegate tasks to a built-in AI assistant inside the productfullproof ↗
“Ask the built-in AI agent to investigate data and build scorers, datasets, dashboards”
Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the productfullproof ↗
“Topics automatically analyze and classify logs without manual review”
Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the productfullproof ↗
“Example: define an Eval with dataset, task function, and scorer programmatically”
Have an agent create a dataset, trigger an eval run programmatically, and read back the resultsfullproof ↗
“Example: define an Eval with dataset, task function, and scorer programmatically”
Write custom code-based scorers and metrics for my evaluationsfullproof ↗
“Experiments are immutable comparable records of eval runs, run from code or UI, tracked over time, integrated into CI/CD”
Compare eval runs side by side to catch regressions between prompt or model versionsfullproof ↗
“Experiments are immutable comparable records of eval runs, run from code or UI, tracked over time, integrated into CI/CD”
Run evals in CI and gate deployments on their resultsfullproof ↗
“Datasets are versioned collections of test cases used to run evaluations and track improvements over time”
Curate datasets from production traces and run offline evaluations against themfullproof ↗
“Self-hosting supports data residency and compliance by keeping customer data within your own cloud account and region”
Choose where my data is stored (region/residency)partialproof ↗
“Self-hosting supports data residency and compliance by keeping customer data within your own cloud account and region”
“Download logs as CSV or JSON, or pull them locally with bt sync pull”
Bulk-export traces and datasets to blob storage or my data warehousepartialproof ↗
Contradicted (2)
“Query logs, author prompts/scorers, configure monitoring, and run evals from MCP-compatible clients like Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, VS Code”
Plug MCP servers into this product so it can use their toolsnoneproof ↗
“MCP integration connects Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and other clients to query logs, author scorers, configure Topics, run evals”
Plug MCP servers into this product so it can use their toolsnoneproof ↗
Undersold (16)
Point an agent at llms.txt or agent-oriented docspartialproof ↗
Test against a sandbox environment without touching production datapartialproof ↗
Perform bulk operations across many items at oncefullproof ↗
Define rules that trigger actions automatically on eventspartialproof ↗
Attribute cost and usage to users, sessions, and features via custom metadatapartialproof ↗
See cost and token usage per request, model, and time period in dashboardspartialproof ↗
Score outputs with configurable LLM-as-a-judge evaluatorsfullproof ↗
Export all of my data in open formats and leavepartialproof ↗
Version prompts and deploy changes to production without shipping codepartialproof ↗
Instrument apps in both Python and JS/TS with officially supported SDKspartialproof ↗
Trace multi-step agent runs as nested spans grouped into sessions or threadspartialproof ↗
Business model
Free tier with capped traces and scores; Pro is a flat monthly platform fee plus usage-based ingestion/processing overages; Enterprise (incl. hybrid self-hosting) is custom.
pricing ↗Score trend
How this product’s scores have moved as evidence and verdicts are re-derived — a point per change, not per day.
Flag
⚑ Flag a verdictThink a verdict is wrong? Opens a prefilled GitHub issue — or use the ⚑ next to any verdict above.
For agents
Agent surface uptime llms.txt 100% (30d, checked every 6h since Sep 8 '26)
