Rank #1 of 6 in AI Customer Support Agents
Lorikeet (Operator Technologies AI Pty Ltd) · commercial
Try itExperimental
See what an agent can do with Lorikeet before you ever sign up. Pick a story: recorded sessions replay real probe-harness transcripts; commands tagged live-capable can re-run against the real endpoint from our edge, right now (▶ run live — the exact same request, live and recorded lines always labeled); the live MCP handshake runs real requests from our edge, right now — including, where the server allows it, one real read-only tool call (bring your own key for auth-gated servers); sandboxed self-drive sessions are designed and gated (docs/TRY-IT.md).
$curl -si https://api.lorikeetcx.ai/v1/customerrecorded session — replayed, not liveVerified integrations
Connections to other tracked products — hover a chip for the verbatim evidence quote behind it.
By theme — the product's score on each story themeBy theme
Agent actions — stories about agent actions in this arenaAgent actionsevidence →
Stories about agent actions in this arena
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticnessevidence →
How well agents can access and operate the product
Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depthevidence →
How much of the product can run unattended
Channels languages — stories about channels languages in this arenaChannels languagesevidence →
Stories about channels languages in this arena
Escalation handoff — stories about escalation handoff in this arenaEscalation handoffevidence →
Stories about escalation handoff in this arena
Guardrails safety — stories about guardrails safety in this arenaGuardrails safetyevidence →
Stories about guardrails safety in this arena
Insights analytics — stories about insights analytics in this arenaInsights analyticsevidence →
Stories about insights analytics in this arena
Integrations platform — stories about integrations platform in this arenaIntegrations platformevidence →
Stories about integrations platform in this arena
Knowledge grounding — stories about knowledge grounding in this arenaKnowledge groundingevidence →
Stories about knowledge grounding in this arena
Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpennessevidence →
Open source, data portability, and self-hosting stories
Pricing economics — stories about pricing economics in this arenaPricing economicsevidence →
Stories about pricing economics in this arena
Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy postureevidence →
Data-handling and privacy stories
Resolution quality — stories about resolution quality in this arenaResolution qualityevidence →
Stories about resolution quality in this arena
Testing qa — stories about testing qa in this arenaTesting qaevidence →
Stories about testing qa in this arena
Story verdicts — every judged story with its evidenceStory verdicts
Follow the green: where the map greys out is where Lorikeet stops today. ✓ full · ~ partial · ! disputed · — none · n/a not applicable.
Agent actions — stories about agent actions in this arenaAgent actions
Stories about agent actions in this arena
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness
How well agents can access and operate the product
API surface
Drive the product through a documented public API
✓8/10
unlocks → Webhooks · Official SDKs · Machine-readable spec · Versioning policy · Official CLI · Full data export
Subscribe to events via webhooks
—–
Build against official SDKs
—–
Issue scoped/least-privilege API credentials for an agent
~3/10
Connect an agent via an official MCP server
✓7/10
Download a machine-readable API spec (OpenAPI or equivalent)
—–
Rely on versioned APIs with a documented deprecation policy
—–
Test against a sandbox environment without touching production data
~5/10
Explore an interactive API reference with runnable examples
n/an/a
Docs for agents
Point an agent at llms.txt or agent-oriented docs
✓9/10
Agentic features
Delegate tasks to a built-in AI assistant inside the product
✓7/10
Operate the product with natural-language commands
✓8/10
Plug MCP servers into this product so it can use their tools
~5/10
Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the product
✓8/10
Set up automations that run autonomously in the background
~7/10
Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depth
How much of the product can run unattended
Channels languages — stories about channels languages in this arenaChannels languages
Stories about channels languages in this arena
One agent covers chat, email, and in-app, plus the channels my customers actually use — Slack, WhatsApp, social
~6/10
The agent supports customers in many languages, even where my knowledge base exists only in English
—–
The agent handles phone calls — speech in, speech out — with the same knowledge and actions as chat
~4/10
Escalation handoff — stories about escalation handoff in this arenaEscalation handoff
Stories about escalation handoff in this arena
Guardrails safety — stories about guardrails safety in this arenaGuardrails safety
Stories about guardrails safety in this arena
Guardrails stop the agent from inventing policies, prices, or promises — off-knowledge questions get a safe decline, not a guess
✓8/10
Launch in a supervised mode where the agent drafts replies for human approval before anything reaches a customer
—0/10
I mark topics as human-only — legal threats, cancellations, security — and the agent never freelances on them
~5/10
Insights analytics — stories about insights analytics in this arenaInsights analytics
Stories about insights analytics in this arena
Integrations platform — stories about integrations platform in this arenaIntegrations platform
Stories about integrations platform in this arena
Knowledge grounding — stories about knowledge grounding in this arenaKnowledge grounding
Stories about knowledge grounding in this arena
Knowledge stays current automatically — the agent re-syncs sources on a schedule or on change, not via manual re-uploads
—0/10
The platform surfaces knowledge gaps and conflicting content that cause the agent to miss or fumble questions
✓8/10
Every answer is grounded in my own content and shows which article or source it drew from
—0/10
The agent ingests my help center, docs, past tickets, and internal wikis as knowledge sources without manual re-authoring
✓7/10
Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpenness
Open source, data portability, and self-hosting stories
Pricing economics — stories about pricing economics in this arenaPricing economics
Stories about pricing economics in this arena
Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy posture
Data-handling and privacy stories
Resolution quality — stories about resolution quality in this arenaResolution quality
Stories about resolution quality in this arena
Answers use the customer's live data — plan, order status, account history — not just generic help articles
✓7/10
The agent asks clarifying questions and works through multi-step troubleshooting instead of dumping one canned answer
~6/10
The agent fully resolves a meaningful share of conversations end-to-end — measured as resolutions, not mere deflections or bounces
~6/10
I control the agent's tone and brand voice, and it stays consistent across topics and languages
~6/10
Testing qa — stories about testing qa in this arenaTesting qa
Stories about testing qa in this arena
Sorted by importance (agentic first) (high → low) · 53/53 stories · click a row’s chevron for the rationale and evidence
Drive the product through a documented public API G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 3 | full | 8/10 | Tprobed | |
Connect an agent via an official MCP server G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 3 | full | 7/10 | Tprobed | |
Delegate tasks to a built-in AI assistant inside the product G Agentic features | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 3 | full | 7/10 | Cclaimed | |
Plug MCP servers into this product so it can use their tools G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 3 | partial | 5/10 | Cclaimed | |
Point an agent at llms.txt or agent-oriented docs G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | full | 9/10 | Tprobed | |
Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the product G Agentic features | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | full | 8/10 | Cclaimed | |
Operate the product with natural-language commands G Agentic features | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | full | 8/10 | Tprobed | |
Set up automations that run autonomously in the background G Agentic features | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | partial | 7/10 | Cclaimed | |
Issue scoped/least-privilege API credentials for an agent G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | partial | 3/10 | Cclaimed | |
Use an official CLI G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | none | 0/10 | ||
Build against official SDKs G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
Download a machine-readable API spec (OpenAPI or equivalent) G Api quality | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
Explore an interactive API reference with runnable examples G Api quality | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | n/a | untested | none yet | |
Rely on versioned APIs with a documented deprecation policy G Api quality | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
Run the product headlessly / in CI for automation G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | n/a | untested | none yet | |
Subscribe to events via webhooks G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
Test against a sandbox environment without touching production data G Api quality | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 1 | partial | 5/10 | Cclaimed | |
Guardrails stop the agent from inventing policies, prices, or promises — off-knowledge questions get a safe decline, not a guess C Hallucination | ai-native user | Guardrails safety — stories about guardrails safety in this arenaGuardrails safety | 3 | full | 8/10 | Cclaimed | |
Prevent my data from being used to train AI models G | ai-native user | Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy posture | 3 | full | 7/10 | Cclaimed | |
The agent ingests my help center, docs, past tickets, and internal wikis as knowledge sources without manual re-authoring C Ingestion | support ops lead | Knowledge grounding — stories about knowledge grounding in this arenaKnowledge grounding | 3 | full | 7/10 | Cclaimed | |
The agent takes real actions through my APIs — refunds, order changes, subscription updates — with scoped auth per action C Actions | developer | Agent actions — stories about agent actions in this arenaAgent actions | 3 | full | 7/10 | Cclaimed | |
Define rules that trigger actions automatically on events G | ai-native user | Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depth | 3 | partial | 6/10 | Cclaimed | |
The agent fully resolves a meaningful share of conversations end-to-end — measured as resolutions, not mere deflections or bounces C Resolution | support leader | Resolution quality — stories about resolution quality in this arenaResolution quality | 3 | partial | 6/10 | Cclaimed | |
When the agent escalates, the human gets the full conversation, a summary, and collected details — the customer never repeats themselves C Handoff | support leader | Escalation handoff — stories about escalation handoff in this arenaEscalation handoff | 3 | partial | 6/10 | Cclaimed | |
Dashboards show resolution rate, CSAT, handoff rate, and cost per resolution — the numbers I report to my exec team C Analytics | support leader | Insights analytics — stories about insights analytics in this arenaInsights analytics | 3 | partial | 5/10 | Cclaimed | |
The agent runs inside my existing helpdesk — Zendesk, Salesforce, Intercom — or standalone, syncing tickets and context both ways C Helpdesk | developer | Integrations platform — stories about integrations platform in this arenaIntegrations platform | 3 | partial | 5/10 | Cclaimed | |
Every answer is grounded in my own content and shows which article or source it drew from C Grounding | ai-native user | Knowledge grounding — stories about knowledge grounding in this arenaKnowledge grounding | 3 | none | 0/10 | ||
Export all of my data in open formats and leave G | ai-native user | Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpenness | 3 | none | untested | none yet | |
Self-host the core product G | ai-native user | Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpenness | 3 | n/a | untested | none yet | |
I test the agent against historical tickets or simulated conversations before it faces real customers C Simulation | support ops lead | Testing qa — stories about testing qa in this arenaTesting qa | 2 | full | 9/10 | Cclaimed | |
Answers use the customer's live data — plan, order status, account history — not just generic help articles C Personalization | support leader | Resolution quality — stories about resolution quality in this arenaResolution quality | 2 | full | 7/10 | Cclaimed | |
I encode standard operating procedures the agent follows step-by-step for known issue types, with deterministic branching C Procedures | support ops lead | Agent actions — stories about agent actions in this arenaAgent actions | 2 | full | 7/10 | Cclaimed | |
Perform bulk operations across many items at once G | ai-native user | Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depth | 2 | full | 7/10 | Cclaimed | |
Do everything through the API that I can do in the UI G | ai-native user | Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpenness | 2 | partial | 6/10 | Tprobed | |
One agent covers chat, email, and in-app, plus the channels my customers actually use — Slack, WhatsApp, social C Channels | support leader | Channels languages — stories about channels languages in this arenaChannels languages | 2 | partial | 6/10 | Cclaimed | |
The agent asks clarifying questions and works through multi-step troubleshooting instead of dumping one canned answer C Reasoning | support leader | Resolution quality — stories about resolution quality in this arenaResolution quality | 2 | partial | 6/10 | Cclaimed | |
I configure when the agent must hand off — by topic, sentiment, customer tier, or explicit request — and it reliably obeys C Rules | support ops lead | Escalation handoff — stories about escalation handoff in this arenaEscalation handoff | 2 | partial | 5/10 | Cclaimed | |
I mark topics as human-only — legal threats, cancellations, security — and the agent never freelances on them C Topic controls | support ops lead | Guardrails safety — stories about guardrails safety in this arenaGuardrails safety | 2 | partial | 5/10 | Cclaimed | |
Control data retention and deletion G | ai-native user | Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy posture | 2 | partial | 4/10 | Cclaimed | |
The agent handles phone calls — speech in, speech out — with the same knowledge and actions as chat C Voice | support leader | Channels languages — stories about channels languages in this arenaChannels languages | 2 | partial | 4/10 | Cclaimed | |
Pricing is outcome-based and published — I pay per resolution with caps and controls, not an opaque enterprise quote G Pricing | support leader | Pricing economics — stories about pricing economics in this arenaPricing economics | 2 | partial | 3/10 | Cclaimed | |
Schedule recurring jobs or workflows G | ai-native user | Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depth | 2 | partial | 3/10 | Cclaimed | |
Knowledge stays current automatically — the agent re-syncs sources on a schedule or on change, not via manual re-uploads C Freshness | support ops lead | Knowledge grounding — stories about knowledge grounding in this arenaKnowledge grounding | 2 | none | 0/10 | ||
Launch in a supervised mode where the agent drafts replies for human approval before anything reaches a customer C Supervision | support ops lead | Guardrails safety — stories about guardrails safety in this arenaGuardrails safety | 2 | none | 0/10 | ||
Opt out of telemetry and usage tracking G | ai-native user | Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy posture | 2 | none | 0/10 | ||
Choose where my data is stored (region/residency) G | ai-native user | Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy posture | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
Read the product's source under an open license G | ai-native user | Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpenness | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
The agent supports customers in many languages, even where my knowledge base exists only in English C Languages | support leader | Channels languages — stories about channels languages in this arenaChannels languages | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
AI conversations get ongoing QA — scored samples, flagged failures, and a review loop that feeds fixes back into the agent C Qa | support ops lead | Testing qa — stories about testing qa in this arenaTesting qa | 1 | full | 8/10 | Cclaimed | |
The platform surfaces knowledge gaps and conflicting content that cause the agent to miss or fumble questions C Gaps | support ops lead | Knowledge grounding — stories about knowledge grounding in this arenaKnowledge grounding | 1 | full | 8/10 | Cclaimed | |
I control the agent's tone and brand voice, and it stays consistent across topics and languages C Voice | support leader | Resolution quality — stories about resolution quality in this arenaResolution quality | 1 | partial | 6/10 | Cclaimed | |
Version, review, and roll back my automations G | ai-native user | Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depth | 1 | partial | 4/10 | Cclaimed | |
The platform clusters conversations by topic and surfaces emerging product issues before they spike ticket volume C Insights | support leader | Insights analytics — stories about insights analytics in this arenaInsights analytics | 1 | none | 0/10 |
Opportunities — the stories that would move this product's scores, from its own judged verdictsOpportunitiestop 8 of 34 stories with headroom
What would move Lorikeet’s scores — derived from its own judged verdicts, biggest headroom first. Each line quotes what the judge found missing; shipping it (or evidencing it publicly) is the fix.
Knowledge grounding — stories about knowledge grounding in this arenaEvery answer is grounded in my own content and shows which article or source it drew from
nonemoves PA Scoreimpact 30
Missing: any documented citation/source-attribution UI or API in agent responses, and independent confirmation that answers reference specific knowledge-base articles.
Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesExport all of my data in open formats and leave
nonemoves PA Scoreimpact 30
Missing: any documentation of export functionality, supported open formats (CSV/JSON), or data portability/exit process.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productUse an official CLI
nonemoves agent-readyimpact 30
Missing: any mention of a CLI binary/tool, installation instructions, or CLI command reference.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productBuild against official SDKs
nonemoves agent-readyimpact 30
Missing: any documented official SDK, its language support, or developer-facing library docs.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productSubscribe to events via webhooks
nonemoves agent-readyimpact 30
The evidence pack covers Lorikeet's MCP server, simulations, coach, and guardrails features, but contains no mention of webhooks or event subscription mechanisms for AI-native users to receive push notifications on events.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productDownload a machine-readable API spec (OpenAPI or equivalent)
nonemoves API qualityimpact 30
No evidence of a downloadable OpenAPI spec or machine-readable API documentation; evidence only covers MCP server integration, workflows, and product features, not a formal API spec artifact.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productRely on versioned APIs with a documented deprecation policy
nonemoves API qualityimpact 30
Missing: any documented API version scheme, changelog of breaking changes, or stated deprecation/support timeline.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productPlug MCP servers into this product so it can use their tools
partialq5/10moves agent-readyimpact 22.5
Missing: dedicated documentation on how a user configures/adds third-party MCP servers into Lorikeet, a list of supported MCP integrations, and independent confirmation of this client-side tool-use capability.
Showing the top 8 of 34 — every none/partial verdict in the story verdicts table is headroom.
Think a verdict is wrong? Every verdicts-table row has a Flag link — see the methodology.
Coverage map — which docs area, API section, or community source covers which judged storiesCoverage map8 surfaces · 36 covered stories
Where the cited evidence behind each covered verdict came from — the same citations the verdicts table shows, no extra judging.
Product docs31 stories
- The agent takes real actions through my APIs — refunds, order changes, subscription updates — with scoped auth per action
- I encode standard operating procedures the agent follows step-by-step for known issue types, with deterministic branching
- Plug MCP servers into this product so it can use their tools
- Issue scoped/least-privilege API credentials for an agent
- Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the product
- Set up automations that run autonomously in the background
- Delegate tasks to a built-in AI assistant inside the product
- Test against a sandbox environment without touching production data
- Perform bulk operations across many items at once
- Define rules that trigger actions automatically on events
- Schedule recurring jobs or workflows
- Version, review, and roll back my automations
- One agent covers chat, email, and in-app, plus the channels my customers actually use — Slack, WhatsApp, social
- The agent handles phone calls — speech in, speech out — with the same knowledge and actions as chat
- I configure when the agent must hand off — by topic, sentiment, customer tier, or explicit request — and it reliably obeys
- Guardrails stop the agent from inventing policies, prices, or promises — off-knowledge questions get a safe decline, not a guess
- I mark topics as human-only — legal threats, cancellations, security — and the agent never freelances on them
- Dashboards show resolution rate, CSAT, handoff rate, and cost per resolution — the numbers I report to my exec team
- The agent runs inside my existing helpdesk — Zendesk, Salesforce, Intercom — or standalone, syncing tickets and context both ways
- The platform surfaces knowledge gaps and conflicting content that cause the agent to miss or fumble questions
- The agent ingests my help center, docs, past tickets, and internal wikis as knowledge sources without manual re-authoring
- Do everything through the API that I can do in the UI
- Pricing is outcome-based and published — I pay per resolution with caps and controls, not an opaque enterprise quote
- Prevent my data from being used to train AI models
- Control data retention and deletion
- Answers use the customer's live data — plan, order status, account history — not just generic help articles
- The agent asks clarifying questions and works through multi-step troubleshooting instead of dumping one canned answer
- The agent fully resolves a meaningful share of conversations end-to-end — measured as resolutions, not mere deflections or bounces
- I control the agent's tone and brand voice, and it stays consistent across topics and languages
- AI conversations get ongoing QA — scored samples, flagged failures, and a review loop that feeds fixes back into the agent
- I test the agent against historical tickets or simulated conversations before it faces real customers
Release notes docs18 stories
- I encode standard operating procedures the agent follows step-by-step for known issue types, with deterministic branching
- Connect an agent via an official MCP server
- Drive the product through a documented public API
- Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the product
- Delegate tasks to a built-in AI assistant inside the product
- Operate the product with natural-language commands
- Test against a sandbox environment without touching production data
- Perform bulk operations across many items at once
- Version, review, and roll back my automations
- One agent covers chat, email, and in-app, plus the channels my customers actually use — Slack, WhatsApp, social
- When the agent escalates, the human gets the full conversation, a summary, and collected details — the customer never repeats themselves
- I configure when the agent must hand off — by topic, sentiment, customer tier, or explicit request — and it reliably obeys
- The agent runs inside my existing helpdesk — Zendesk, Salesforce, Intercom — or standalone, syncing tickets and context both ways
- The platform surfaces knowledge gaps and conflicting content that cause the agent to miss or fumble questions
- The agent ingests my help center, docs, past tickets, and internal wikis as knowledge sources without manual re-authoring
- Do everything through the API that I can do in the UI
- The agent asks clarifying questions and works through multi-step troubleshooting instead of dumping one canned answer
- The agent fully resolves a meaningful share of conversations end-to-end — measured as resolutions, not mere deflections or bounces
MCP docs14 stories
- The agent takes real actions through my APIs — refunds, order changes, subscription updates — with scoped auth per action
- I encode standard operating procedures the agent follows step-by-step for known issue types, with deterministic branching
- Point an agent at llms.txt or agent-oriented docs
- Connect an agent via an official MCP server
- Drive the product through a documented public API
- Operate the product with natural-language commands
- Test against a sandbox environment without touching production data
- Perform bulk operations across many items at once
- Version, review, and roll back my automations
- The platform surfaces knowledge gaps and conflicting content that cause the agent to miss or fumble questions
- The agent ingests my help center, docs, past tickets, and internal wikis as knowledge sources without manual re-authoring
- Do everything through the API that I can do in the UI
- Answers use the customer's live data — plan, order status, account history — not just generic help articles
- I test the agent against historical tickets or simulated conversations before it faces real customers
Industry docs7 stories
- The agent takes real actions through my APIs — refunds, order changes, subscription updates — with scoped auth per action
- Define rules that trigger actions automatically on events
- When the agent escalates, the human gets the full conversation, a summary, and collected details — the customer never repeats themselves
- I configure when the agent must hand off — by topic, sentiment, customer tier, or explicit request — and it reliably obeys
- Guardrails stop the agent from inventing policies, prices, or promises — off-knowledge questions get a safe decline, not a guess
- I mark topics as human-only — legal threats, cancellations, security — and the agent never freelances on them
- Answers use the customer's live data — plan, order status, account history — not just generic help articles
Integrations docs5 stories
- The agent takes real actions through my APIs — refunds, order changes, subscription updates — with scoped auth per action
- Plug MCP servers into this product so it can use their tools
- The agent runs inside my existing helpdesk — Zendesk, Salesforce, Intercom — or standalone, syncing tickets and context both ways
- The agent ingests my help center, docs, past tickets, and internal wikis as knowledge sources without manual re-authoring
- Answers use the customer's live data — plan, order status, account history — not just generic help articles
llms.txt3 stories
Competitors docs3 stories
- Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the product
- Dashboards show resolution rate, CSAT, handoff rate, and cost per resolution — the numbers I report to my exec team
- The agent fully resolves a meaningful share of conversations end-to-end — measured as resolutions, not mere deflections or bounces
lorikeetcx.ai3 stories
- One agent covers chat, email, and in-app, plus the channels my customers actually use — Slack, WhatsApp, social
- The agent handles phone calls — speech in, speech out — with the same knowledge and actions as chat
- The agent fully resolves a meaningful share of conversations end-to-end — measured as resolutions, not mere deflections or bounces
Probe proofs — replayable recordings from the probe harnessProbe proofs
Replayable recordings from our probe harness — see the Prove-It protocol to submit one.
$curl -si https://api.lorikeetcx.ai/v1/customerreproduced$ curl -si https://api.lorikeetcx.ai/v1/customer
HTTP/2 400
x-powered-by: Express
vary: Origin
access-control-allow-credentials: true
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
cache-control: no-store
x-content-type-options: nosniff
referrer-policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
x-frame-options: DENY
content-security-policy-report-only: default-src 'self'; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self'; report-uri /csp-report
content-type: application/json; charset=utf-8
content-length: 200
etag: W/"c8-BqmcSTfKQoiDP9ESaJAIYtieSFE"
date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 18:40:35 GMT
via: 1.1 google
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=2592000
{"status":400,"title":"Bad request","detail":"Missing LORIKEET_CLIENT_ID in authorization header.","type":"https://docs.lorikeetcx.ai/api-reference/errors/invalid-client-id","instance":"/v1/customer"}
$curl -s https://docs.lorikeetcx.ai/llms.txt | head -8reproduced$ curl -s https://docs.lorikeetcx.ai/llms.txt | head -8 # Reference - [Lorikeet MCP Server](https://docs.lorikeetcx.ai/mcp/mcp-server.md): Connect to your Lorikeet account from ChatGPT, Claude, Claude Code, and MintMCP using the Model Context Protocol. - [Running simulations from MCP](https://docs.lorikeetcx.ai/mcp/skills.md): How to get a guided, orchestrated simulation experience when using the Lorikeet MCP server.
$curl -s https://docs.lorikeetcx.ai/mcp/mcp-server.md | head -8reproduced$ curl -s https://docs.lorikeetcx.ai/mcp/mcp-server.md | head -8 > ## Documentation Index > Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.lorikeetcx.ai/llms.txt > Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further. # Lorikeet MCP Server > Connect to your Lorikeet account from ChatGPT, Claude, Claude Code, and MintMCP using the Model Context Protocol.
$curl -si https://mcp.lorikeetcx.ai | head -8reproduced$ curl -si https://mcp.lorikeetcx.ai | head -8 HTTP/2 405 x-powered-by: Express access-control-allow-origin: * access-control-allow-methods: POST, DELETE, OPTIONS access-control-allow-headers: Authorization, Content-Type, Accept, MCP-Protocol-Version, MCP-Session-Id, Last-Event-ID access-control-expose-headers: MCP-Session-Id, MCP-Protocol-Version, WWW-Authenticate access-control-max-age: 86400 allow: POST, DELETE
Claims vs evidence — vendor claims reconciled against independent verdictsClaims vs evidence
2 of 14 testable claims verified · 1 contradicted → integrity 0/100
18 distinct capability claims found in Lorikeet’s own claimed-docs/GitHub materials, reconciled against our judge’s independent verdicts.
2
Verified
11
Unverified
1
Contradicted
23
Undersold
Verified (3)
“MCP server lets Lorikeet be controlled from Claude Code, Claude.ai, ChatGPT, and Codex”
“Build and iterate on workflows using natural language”
Operate the product with natural-language commandsfullproof ↗
“Run and validate tool configurations directly from an AI assistant”
Unverified (16)
“Audit knowledge base articles at scale to find gaps and quality issues”
The platform surfaces knowledge gaps and conflicting content that cause the agent to miss or fumble questionsfullproof ↗
“Build and iterate on workflows using natural language”
I encode standard operating procedures the agent follows step-by-step for known issue types, with deterministic branchingfullproof ↗
“Generate simulations from real tickets and run them in bulk batches to test workflow changes”
I test the agent against historical tickets or simulated conversations before it faces real customersfullproof ↗
“Side-by-side batch comparisons show how a workflow edit changes outcomes across hundreds of scenarios”
I test the agent against historical tickets or simulated conversations before it faces real customersfullproof ↗
“Author adversarial guardrail scenarios like prompt injection and mid-conversation goal switches to test defenses”
Guardrails stop the agent from inventing policies, prices, or promises — off-knowledge questions get a safe decline, not a guessfullproof ↗
“Author adversarial guardrail scenarios like prompt injection and mid-conversation goal switches to test defenses”
I test the agent against historical tickets or simulated conversations before it faces real customersfullproof ↗
“Ticket Quality Score automatically reviews 100% of conversations against quality standards”
AI conversations get ongoing QA — scored samples, flagged failures, and a review loop that feeds fixes back into the agentfullproof ↗
“Coach assistant can be used in Lorikeet, Slack, Claude, ChatGPT, or via MCP”
Delegate tasks to a built-in AI assistant inside the productfullproof ↗
“Works alongside existing tools with no migration required”
The agent runs inside my existing helpdesk — Zendesk, Salesforce, Intercom — or standalone, syncing tickets and context both wayspartialproof ↗
“Outbound messaging enforces recorded consent with opt-out handling and escalation for sensitive situations”
I configure when the agent must hand off — by topic, sentiment, customer tier, or explicit request — and it reliably obeyspartialproof ↗
“Connects quickly to ticketing system, knowledge base, and internal tools to ingest data and take action”
The agent ingests my help center, docs, past tickets, and internal wikis as knowledge sources without manual re-authoringfullproof ↗
“Connects quickly to ticketing system, knowledge base, and internal tools to ingest data and take action”
The agent runs inside my existing helpdesk — Zendesk, Salesforce, Intercom — or standalone, syncing tickets and context both wayspartialproof ↗
“When AI can't resolve a conversation, a human agent steps in inside the same platform”
When the agent escalates, the human gets the full conversation, a summary, and collected details — the customer never repeats themselvespartialproof ↗
“Replay historical and synthetic tickets in bulk to project resolution quality and surface knowledge gaps before deploying”
I test the agent against historical tickets or simulated conversations before it faces real customersfullproof ↗
“Replay historical and synthetic tickets in bulk to project resolution quality and surface knowledge gaps before deploying”
The platform surfaces knowledge gaps and conflicting content that cause the agent to miss or fumble questionsfullproof ↗
“Analytics track resolution quality, CSAT, revenue impact, and operational efficiency”
Dashboards show resolution rate, CSAT, handoff rate, and cost per resolution — the numbers I report to my exec teampartialproof ↗
Contradicted (1)
“CLI command can generate simulations for a specific workflow (e.g. refunds)”
Undersold (23)
The agent takes real actions through my APIs — refunds, order changes, subscription updates — with scoped auth per actionfullproof ↗
Point an agent at llms.txt or agent-oriented docsfullproof ↗
Plug MCP servers into this product so it can use their toolspartialproof ↗
Drive the product through a documented public APIfullproof ↗
Issue scoped/least-privilege API credentials for an agentpartialproof ↗
Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the productfullproof ↗
Set up automations that run autonomously in the backgroundpartialproof ↗
Test against a sandbox environment without touching production datapartialproof ↗
Perform bulk operations across many items at oncefullproof ↗
Define rules that trigger actions automatically on eventspartialproof ↗
One agent covers chat, email, and in-app, plus the channels my customers actually use — Slack, WhatsApp, socialpartialproof ↗
The agent handles phone calls — speech in, speech out — with the same knowledge and actions as chatpartialproof ↗
I mark topics as human-only — legal threats, cancellations, security — and the agent never freelances on thempartialproof ↗
Do everything through the API that I can do in the UIpartialproof ↗
Pricing is outcome-based and published — I pay per resolution with caps and controls, not an opaque enterprise quotepartialproof ↗
Prevent my data from being used to train AI modelsfullproof ↗
Answers use the customer's live data — plan, order status, account history — not just generic help articlesfullproof ↗
The agent asks clarifying questions and works through multi-step troubleshooting instead of dumping one canned answerpartialproof ↗
The agent fully resolves a meaningful share of conversations end-to-end — measured as resolutions, not mere deflections or bouncespartialproof ↗
I control the agent's tone and brand voice, and it stays consistent across topics and languagespartialproof ↗
Claims outside our story set (2)
Real capability claims found in Lorikeet’s own materials, but no story in this arena’s taxonomy covers them yet — that’s feedback on the taxonomy, not a mark against the product.
“Diagnose tickets by tracing workflow execution to find root causes”
source ↗“Explore setup by inspecting workflows, tools, and integrations”
source ↗
Business model
Pay-per-resolution: Start $1,500/mo ($0.95 chat/email/SMS, $1.50 voice per resolution), Scale $4,000/mo ($0.80/$1.20), Enterprise custom; only successful resolutions are billed.
pricing ↗Score trend
How this product’s scores have moved as evidence and verdicts are re-derived — a point per change, not per day.
Try Experimental
Run it in the microterminal →Recorded agent sessions — and a live MCP handshake where the vendor ships one.
Flag
⚑ Flag a verdictThink a verdict is wrong? Opens a prefilled GitHub issue — or use the ⚑ next to any verdict above.
For agents
Agent surface uptime MCP up · llms.txt up (tracking since Sep 11 '26)