Rank #8 of 8 in LLM Evals & Observability
Access
Showcase


Verified integrations
No integration evidence found in our corpus for this product yet — that means none was found, never that it doesn’t integrate.
By theme — the product's score on each story themeBy theme
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticnessevidence →
How well agents can access and operate the product
Alerting dashboards — stories about alerting dashboards in this arenaAlerting dashboardsevidence →
Stories about alerting dashboards in this arena
Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depthevidence →
How much of the product can run unattended
Cost monitoring — stories about cost monitoring in this arenaCost monitoringevidence →
Stories about cost monitoring in this arena
Data access export — stories about data access export in this arenaData access exportevidence →
Stories about data access export in this arena
Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasetsevidence →
Measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression tracking
Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpennessevidence →
Open source, data portability, and self-hosting stories
Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy postureevidence →
Data-handling and privacy stories
Prompt management — stories about prompt management in this arenaPrompt managementevidence →
Stories about prompt management in this arena
Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentationevidence →
Instrumenting code and tracing requests end to end
Story verdicts — every judged story with its evidenceStory verdicts
Follow the green: where the map greys out is where Galileo stops today. ✓ full · ~ partial · ! disputed · — none · n/a not applicable.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness
How well agents can access and operate the product
API surface
Drive the product through a documented public API
~6/10
unlocks → Webhooks · Scoped API keys · Machine-readable spec · Versioning policy · Official CLI · Full data export
Subscribe to events via webhooks
—0/10
Build against official SDKs
~6/10
Issue scoped/least-privilege API credentials for an agent
—–
Connect an agent via an official MCP server
✓8/10
Download a machine-readable API spec (OpenAPI or equivalent)
—0/10
Rely on versioned APIs with a documented deprecation policy
—0/10
Test against a sandbox environment without touching production data
~4/10
Explore an interactive API reference with runnable examples
—0/10
Docs for agents
Point an agent at llms.txt or agent-oriented docs
✓8/10
Agentic features
Delegate tasks to a built-in AI assistant inside the product
—–
Operate the product with natural-language commands
~5/10
Plug MCP servers into this product so it can use their tools
n/an/a
Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the product
~5/10
Set up automations that run autonomously in the background
~3/10
Alerting dashboards — stories about alerting dashboards in this arenaAlerting dashboards
Stories about alerting dashboards in this arena
Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depth
How much of the product can run unattended
Cost monitoring — stories about cost monitoring in this arenaCost monitoring
Stories about cost monitoring in this arena
Data access export — stories about data access export in this arenaData access export
Stories about data access export in this arena
Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets
Measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression tracking
Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpenness
Open source, data portability, and self-hosting stories
Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy posture
Data-handling and privacy stories
Prompt management — stories about prompt management in this arenaPrompt management
Stories about prompt management in this arena
Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation
Instrumenting code and tracing requests end to end
Have an agent query my traces, metrics, and eval results through an API or MCP server to debug my app
~5/10
Mask or redact sensitive data before it is stored in traces
—–
Instrument apps in both Python and JS/TS with officially supported SDKs
~4/10
Sorted by importance (agentic first) (high → low) · 52/52 stories · click a row’s chevron for the rationale and evidence
Connect an agent via an official MCP server G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 3 | full | 8/10 | Tprobed | |
Drive the product through a documented public API G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 3 | partial | 6/10 | Tprobed | |
Plug MCP servers into this product so it can use their tools G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 3 | n/a | 0/10 | ||
Delegate tasks to a built-in AI assistant inside the product G Agentic features | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 3 | none | untested | none yet | |
Point an agent at llms.txt or agent-oriented docs G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | full | 8/10 | Tprobed | |
Build against official SDKs G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | partial | 6/10 | Tprobed | |
Run the product headlessly / in CI for automation G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | partial | 6/10 | Cclaimed | |
Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the product G Agentic features | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | partial | 5/10 | Cclaimed | |
Operate the product with natural-language commands G Agentic features | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | partial | 5/10 | Tprobed | |
Set up automations that run autonomously in the background G Agentic features | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | partial | 3/10 | Cclaimed | |
Download a machine-readable API spec (OpenAPI or equivalent) G Api quality | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | none | 0/10 | ||
Explore an interactive API reference with runnable examples G Api quality | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | none | 0/10 | ||
Rely on versioned APIs with a documented deprecation policy G Api quality | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | none | 0/10 | ||
Subscribe to events via webhooks G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | none | 0/10 | ||
Issue scoped/least-privilege API credentials for an agent G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
Use an official CLI G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
Test against a sandbox environment without touching production data G Api quality | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 1 | partial | 4/10 | Cclaimed | |
Curate datasets from production traces and run offline evaluations against them C Offline evals | ml engineer | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 3 | full | 8/10 | Cclaimed | |
Score outputs with configurable LLM-as-a-judge evaluators C Offline evals | ml engineer | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 3 | full | 8/10 | Cclaimed | |
Capture traces of my LLM calls with inputs, outputs, latency, and token usage C Trace capture | developer | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 3 | full | 7/10 | Cclaimed | |
Compare eval runs side by side to catch regressions between prompt or model versions C Offline evals | ml engineer | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 3 | partial | 5/10 | Cclaimed | |
Have an agent query my traces, metrics, and eval results through an API or MCP server to debug my app C Ai observability | ai-native user | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 3 | partial | 5/10 | Tprobed | |
Send and receive traces over OpenTelemetry (OTLP) instead of a proprietary format C Trace capture | developer | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 3 | partial | 5/10 | Cclaimed | |
Define rules that trigger actions automatically on events G | ai-native user | Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depth | 3 | partial | 3/10 | Cclaimed | |
Version prompts and deploy changes to production without shipping code C Prompt workflow | developer | Prompt management — stories about prompt management in this arenaPrompt management | 3 | none | 0/10 | ||
Export all of my data in open formats and leave G | ai-native user | Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpenness | 3 | none | untested | none yet | |
Prevent my data from being used to train AI models G | ai-native user | Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy posture | 3 | none | untested | none yet | |
See cost and token usage per request, model, and time period in dashboards C Cost tracking | developer | Cost monitoring — stories about cost monitoring in this arenaCost monitoring | 3 | none | untested | none yet | |
Self-host the core product G | ai-native user | Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpenness | 3 | none | untested | none yet | |
Run evaluators continuously on live production traffic, not just offline datasets C Online evals | ml engineer | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 2 | full | 8/10 | Cclaimed | |
Trace multi-step agent runs as nested spans grouped into sessions or threads C Trace capture | developer | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 2 | full | 8/10 | Cclaimed | |
Have an agent create a dataset, trigger an eval run programmatically, and read back the results C Ai eval ops | ai-native user | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 2 | full | 7/10 | Tprobed | |
Write custom code-based scorers and metrics for my evaluations C Offline evals | ml engineer | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 2 | partial | 6/10 | Cclaimed | |
Do everything through the API that I can do in the UI G | ai-native user | Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpenness | 2 | partial | 5/10 | Tprobed | |
Iterate on prompts in a playground against real models and variables C Prompt workflow | developer | Prompt management — stories about prompt management in this arenaPrompt management | 2 | partial | 5/10 | Cclaimed | |
Perform bulk operations across many items at once G | ai-native user | Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depth | 2 | partial | 5/10 | Cclaimed | |
Set alerts on error rates, cost spikes, or eval-score drops and get notified in Slack, PagerDuty, or email C Monitoring | developer | Alerting dashboards — stories about alerting dashboards in this arenaAlerting dashboards | 2 | partial | 5/10 | Cclaimed | |
Attribute cost and usage to users, sessions, and features via custom metadata C Cost tracking | developer | Cost monitoring — stories about cost monitoring in this arenaCost monitoring | 2 | partial | 4/10 | Cclaimed | |
Instrument apps in both Python and JS/TS with officially supported SDKs G Sdk coverage | developer | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 2 | partial | 4/10 | Cclaimed | |
Route outputs to human annotation queues for review and labeling C Human review | ml engineer | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 2 | partial | 4/10 | Cclaimed | |
Read the product's source under an open license G | ai-native user | Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpenness | 2 | partial | 3/10 | Cclaimed | |
Bulk-export traces and datasets to blob storage or my data warehouse C Data export | developer | Data access export — stories about data access export in this arenaData access export | 2 | none | 0/10 | ||
Instrument my app through existing integrations for frameworks like LangChain, the OpenAI SDK, or the Vercel AI SDK C Trace capture | developer | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 2 | none | 0/10 | ||
Run evals in CI and gate deployments on their results C Offline evals | developer | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 2 | none | 0/10 | ||
Build custom dashboards over latency, error, cost, and eval-score metrics C Monitoring | ml engineer | Alerting dashboards — stories about alerting dashboards in this arenaAlerting dashboards | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
Choose where my data is stored (region/residency) G | ai-native user | Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy posture | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
Control data retention and deletion G | ai-native user | Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy posture | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
Mask or redact sensitive data before it is stored in traces C Data controls | developer | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
Opt out of telemetry and usage tracking G | ai-native user | Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy posture | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
Schedule recurring jobs or workflows G | ai-native user | Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depth | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
Capture multimodal payloads (images, audio, files) inside my traces C Trace capture | developer | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 1 | none | untested | none yet | |
Version, review, and roll back my automations G | ai-native user | Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depth | 1 | n/a | untested | none yet |
Opportunities — the stories that would move this product's scores, from its own judged verdictsOpportunitiestop 8 of 42 stories with headroom
What would move Galileo’s scores — derived from its own judged verdicts, biggest headroom first. Each line quotes what the judge found missing; shipping it (or evidencing it publicly) is the fix.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productDelegate tasks to a built-in AI assistant inside the product
nonemoves Built-in AIimpact 45
Galileo's evidence covers evaluating and monitoring external AI agents (agentic metrics, tracing, MCP access to its own capabilities from a dev environment) but nothing about a built-in assistant inside Galileo's own product that a user can delegate tasks to.
Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesExport all of my data in open formats and leave
nonemoves PA Scoreimpact 30
No evidence in the pack describes any data export feature, open-format export, or data portability mechanism for traces, datasets, or experiments — only ingestion, logging, and metric features are documented.
Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesSelf-host the core product
nonemoves PA Scoreimpact 30
Missing: any mention of self-hosting, on-prem deployment, Docker/Helm packages, or enterprise private-cloud install instructions.
Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrevent my data from being used to train AI models
nonemoves PA Scoreimpact 30
The evidence pack covers Galileo's tracing, experiments, metrics, and MCP features but contains no mention of data usage policies, opt-out of model training, or privacy controls regarding customer data being used to train AI models.
Prompt management — stories about prompt management in this arenaVersion prompts and deploy changes to production without shipping code
nonemoves PA Scoreimpact 30
Evidence shows Galileo supports experiments for evaluating prompts and mentions 'setting up prompt templates' via MCP, but there is no documentation of prompt versioning, a prompt registry, or a mechanism to deploy prompt changes to production independent of code deploys.
Cost monitoring — stories about cost monitoring in this arenaSee cost and token usage per request, model, and time period in dashboards
nonemoves PA Scoreimpact 30
The evidence pack covers tracing, experiments, metrics, and alerts, but contains no mention of cost or token usage tracking, nor dashboards broken down by request, model, or time period.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productUse an official CLI
nonemoves agent-readyimpact 30
Missing: any documentation of a dedicated CLI binary/command, install instructions, or command reference.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productIssue scoped/least-privilege API credentials for an agent
nonemoves agent-readyimpact 30
Galileo is an AI observability/evaluation platform; evidence covers tracing, metrics, experiments, and MCP integration, but there is no mention of scoped or least-privilege API credential/key management for agents.
Showing the top 8 of 42 — every none/partial verdict in the story verdicts table is headroom.
Think a verdict is wrong? Every verdicts-table row has a Flag link — see the methodology.
Coverage map — which docs area, API section, or community source covers which judged storiesCoverage map9 surfaces · 28 covered stories
Where the cited evidence behind each covered verdict came from — the same citations the verdicts table shows, no extra judging.
Concepts docs17 stories
- Run the product headlessly / in CI for automation
- Build against official SDKs
- Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the product
- Set up automations that run autonomously in the background
- Operate the product with natural-language commands
- Attribute cost and usage to users, sessions, and features via custom metadata
- Have an agent create a dataset, trigger an eval run programmatically, and read back the results
- Route outputs to human annotation queues for review and labeling
- Write custom code-based scorers and metrics for my evaluations
- Score outputs with configurable LLM-as-a-judge evaluators
- Curate datasets from production traces and run offline evaluations against them
- Run evaluators continuously on live production traffic, not just offline datasets
- Have an agent query my traces, metrics, and eval results through an API or MCP server to debug my app
- Instrument apps in both Python and JS/TS with officially supported SDKs
- Trace multi-step agent runs as nested spans grouped into sessions or threads
- Send and receive traces over OpenTelemetry (OTLP) instead of a proprietary format
- Capture traces of my LLM calls with inputs, outputs, latency, and token usage
Getting started docs14 stories
- Run the product headlessly / in CI for automation
- Connect an agent via an official MCP server
- Drive the product through a documented public API
- Build against official SDKs
- Operate the product with natural-language commands
- Test against a sandbox environment without touching production data
- Perform bulk operations across many items at once
- Have an agent create a dataset, trigger an eval run programmatically, and read back the results
- Compare eval runs side by side to catch regressions between prompt or model versions
- Score outputs with configurable LLM-as-a-judge evaluators
- Curate datasets from production traces and run offline evaluations against them
- Do everything through the API that I can do in the UI
- Iterate on prompts in a playground against real models and variables
- Have an agent query my traces, metrics, and eval results through an API or MCP server to debug my app
GitHub README10 stories
- Run the product headlessly / in CI for automation
- Drive the product through a documented public API
- Build against official SDKs
- Have an agent create a dataset, trigger an eval run programmatically, and read back the results
- Do everything through the API that I can do in the UI
- Read the product's source under an open license
- Instrument apps in both Python and JS/TS with officially supported SDKs
- Trace multi-step agent runs as nested spans grouped into sessions or threads
- Send and receive traces over OpenTelemetry (OTLP) instead of a proprietary format
- Capture traces of my LLM calls with inputs, outputs, latency, and token usage
SDK API docs8 stories
- Run the product headlessly / in CI for automation
- Drive the product through a documented public API
- Build against official SDKs
- Curate datasets from production traces and run offline evaluations against them
- Instrument apps in both Python and JS/TS with officially supported SDKs
- Trace multi-step agent runs as nested spans grouped into sessions or threads
- Send and receive traces over OpenTelemetry (OTLP) instead of a proprietary format
- Capture traces of my LLM calls with inputs, outputs, latency, and token usage
galileo.ai6 stories
- Test against a sandbox environment without touching production data
- Perform bulk operations across many items at once
- Attribute cost and usage to users, sessions, and features via custom metadata
- Route outputs to human annotation queues for review and labeling
- Curate datasets from production traces and run offline evaluations against them
- Run evaluators continuously on live production traffic, not just offline datasets
OpenAPI spec5 stories
How to guides docs5 stories
- Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the product
- Set up automations that run autonomously in the background
- Set alerts on error rates, cost spikes, or eval-score drops and get notified in Slack, PagerDuty, or email
- Define rules that trigger actions automatically on events
- Run evaluators continuously on live production traffic, not just offline datasets
What is galileo docs2 stories
Claims vs evidence — vendor claims reconciled against independent verdictsClaims vs evidence
1 of 12 testable claims verified · 0 contradicted → integrity 8/100
14 distinct capability claims found in Galileo’s own claimed-docs/GitHub materials, reconciled against our judge’s independent verdicts.
1
Verified
11
Unverified
0
Contradicted
16
Undersold
Verified (1)
“MCP integration lets you create/manage datasets, run experiments, and set up prompt templates from your dev environment”
Unverified (11)
“Can create and run a first trace in under 5 minutes”
Capture traces of my LLM calls with inputs, outputs, latency, and token usagefullproof ↗
“Run experiments to evaluate prompts, models, and app code against chosen metrics”
Compare eval runs side by side to catch regressions between prompt or model versionspartialproof ↗
“Captures every session, trace, and span as structured real-time data once instrumented”
Trace multi-step agent runs as nested spans grouped into sessions or threadsfullproof ↗
“Joins spans sharing a trace ID via OpenTelemetry's W3C traceparent header into a single trace”
Send and receive traces over OpenTelemetry (OTLP) instead of a proprietary formatpartialproof ↗
“Lets you extend metrics with custom LLM-as-judge or code-based scorers”
Score outputs with configurable LLM-as-a-judge evaluatorsfullproof ↗
“Lets you extend metrics with custom LLM-as-judge or code-based scorers”
Write custom code-based scorers and metrics for my evaluationspartialproof ↗
“Sends alerts when unexpected events occur”
Set alerts on error rates, cost spikes, or eval-score drops and get notified in Slack, PagerDuty, or emailpartialproof ↗
“Provides an @log decorator to log spans in code”
Instrument apps in both Python and JS/TS with officially supported SDKspartialproof ↗
“Builds datasets from synthetic, development, and live production data”
Curate datasets from production traces and run offline evaluations against themfullproof ↗
“Captures subject matter expert annotations as a living, continuously grounded dataset asset”
Route outputs to human annotation queues for review and labelingpartialproof ↗
“Distills evaluations into Luna models that monitor 100% of production traffic at much lower cost”
Run evaluators continuously on live production traffic, not just offline datasetsfullproof ↗
Undersold (16)
Point an agent at llms.txt or agent-oriented docsfullproof ↗
Run the product headlessly / in CI for automationpartialproof ↗
Drive the product through a documented public APIpartialproof ↗
Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the productpartialproof ↗
Set up automations that run autonomously in the backgroundpartialproof ↗
Operate the product with natural-language commandspartialproof ↗
Test against a sandbox environment without touching production datapartialproof ↗
Perform bulk operations across many items at oncepartialproof ↗
Define rules that trigger actions automatically on eventspartialproof ↗
Attribute cost and usage to users, sessions, and features via custom metadatapartialproof ↗
Have an agent create a dataset, trigger an eval run programmatically, and read back the resultsfullproof ↗
Do everything through the API that I can do in the UIpartialproof ↗
Read the product's source under an open licensepartialproof ↗
Iterate on prompts in a playground against real models and variablespartialproof ↗
Have an agent query my traces, metrics, and eval results through an API or MCP server to debug my apppartialproof ↗
Claims outside our story set (3)
Real capability claims found in Galileo’s own materials, but no story in this arena’s taxonomy covers them yet — that’s feedback on the taxonomy, not a mark against the product.
“UI provides a 'Create Experiment' button to add experiments to a project”
source ↗“Provides agentic metrics to measure multi-step agent task performance, tool use, and decision-making”
source ↗“Accepts natural-language feedback that continuously refines metrics to match your domain”
source ↗
Business model
Free plan (5,000 traces/mo, unlimited users and custom evals); Pro from $100/mo scaling with trace volume; Enterprise adds unlimited traces, VPC/on-prem deploys, SSO, and guardrails.
pricing ↗Score trend
How this product’s scores have moved as evidence and verdicts are re-derived — a point per change, not per day.
Flag
⚑ Flag a verdictThink a verdict is wrong? Opens a prefilled GitHub issue — or use the ⚑ next to any verdict above.
For agents
Agent surface uptime llms.txt 100% (30d, checked every 6h since Sep 8 '26)
