Alternatives

Alternatives to Galileo

7 LLM Evals & Observability rivals, ranked by the same evidence-graded leaderboard — Galileo itself ranks #8 with a PA Score of 19/100. Every “beats Galileo on” below comes from a judged head-to-head round with cited evidence — see the methodology.

#1
Braintrust
Braintrust Data, Inc.
PA Score 38/100vs Galileo →
coverage
43.8/100
Beats Galileo on: Delegate tasks to a built-in AI assistant inside the product · Use an official CLI
#2
Cekura
Cekura
PA Score 36/100vs Galileo →
coverage
31.7/100
Beats Galileo on: Download a machine-readable API spec (OpenAPI or equivalent) · Drive the product through a documented public API
#3
W&B Weave
Weights & Biases (CoreWeave)
PA Score 35/100vs Galileo →
coverage
41.8/100
Beats Galileo on: See cost and token usage per request, model, and time period in dashboards · Download a machine-readable API spec (OpenAPI or equivalent)
#4
Helicone
Helicone, Inc.
PA Score 34/100vs Galileo →
coverage
32.4/100
Beats Galileo on: Version prompts and deploy changes to production without shipping code · Download a machine-readable API spec (OpenAPI or equivalent)
#5
Langfuse
Langfuse GmbH
PA Score 34/100vs Galileo →
coverage
49.4/100
Beats Galileo on: See cost and token usage per request, model, and time period in dashboards · Self-host the core product
#6
Arize Phoenix
Arize AI, Inc.
PA Score 32/100vs Galileo →
coverage
43.5/100
Beats Galileo on: Self-host the core product · Version prompts and deploy changes to production without shipping code
#7
LangSmith
LangChain, Inc.
PA Score 23/100vs Galileo →
coverage
38.6/100
Beats Galileo on: See cost and token usage per request, model, and time period in dashboards · Build custom dashboards over latency, error, cost, and eval-score metrics

Full leaderboard: LLM Evals & Observability arena →