Rank #5 of 8 in LLM Evals & Observability
Install
Showcase


Verified integrations
Connections to other tracked products — hover a chip for the verbatim evidence quote behind it.
By theme — the product's score on each story themeBy theme
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticnessevidence →
How well agents can access and operate the product
Alerting dashboards — stories about alerting dashboards in this arenaAlerting dashboardsevidence →
Stories about alerting dashboards in this arena
Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depthevidence →
How much of the product can run unattended
Cost monitoring — stories about cost monitoring in this arenaCost monitoringevidence →
Stories about cost monitoring in this arena
Data access export — stories about data access export in this arenaData access exportevidence →
Stories about data access export in this arena
Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasetsevidence →
Measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression tracking
Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpennessevidence →
Open source, data portability, and self-hosting stories
Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy postureevidence →
Data-handling and privacy stories
Prompt management — stories about prompt management in this arenaPrompt managementevidence →
Stories about prompt management in this arena
Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentationevidence →
Instrumenting code and tracing requests end to end
Story verdicts — every judged story with its evidenceStory verdicts
What’s free: 2 free · 0 paid · 0 enterprise · 38 not stated in evidence
Follow the green: where the map greys out is where Langfuse stops today. ✓ full · ~ partial · ! disputed · — none · n/a not applicable.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness
How well agents can access and operate the product
API surface
Drive the product through a documented public API
~6/10
unlocks → Scoped API keys · Machine-readable spec · Versioning policy
Subscribe to events via webhooks
~5/10
Build against official SDKs
✓8/10
Issue scoped/least-privilege API credentials for an agent
—–
Connect an agent via an official MCP server
✓7/10
Download a machine-readable API spec (OpenAPI or equivalent)
—0/10
Rely on versioned APIs with a documented deprecation policy
—0/10
Test against a sandbox environment without touching production data
~4/10
Explore an interactive API reference with runnable examples
—0/10
Docs for agents
Point an agent at llms.txt or agent-oriented docs
✓9/10
Agentic features
Delegate tasks to a built-in AI assistant inside the product
—0/10
Operate the product with natural-language commands
~6/10
Plug MCP servers into this product so it can use their tools
n/an/a
Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the product
~4/10
Set up automations that run autonomously in the background
~4/10
Alerting dashboards — stories about alerting dashboards in this arenaAlerting dashboards
Stories about alerting dashboards in this arena
Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depth
How much of the product can run unattended
Cost monitoring — stories about cost monitoring in this arenaCost monitoring
Stories about cost monitoring in this arena
Data access export — stories about data access export in this arenaData access export
Stories about data access export in this arena
Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets
Measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression tracking
Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpenness
Open source, data portability, and self-hosting stories
Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy posture
Data-handling and privacy stories
Prompt management — stories about prompt management in this arenaPrompt management
Stories about prompt management in this arena
Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation
Instrumenting code and tracing requests end to end
Have an agent query my traces, metrics, and eval results through an API or MCP server to debug my app
~6/10
Mask or redact sensitive data before it is stored in traces
—–
Instrument apps in both Python and JS/TS with officially supported SDKs
✓8/10
Sorted by importance (agentic first) (high → low) · 52/52 stories · click a row’s chevron for the rationale and evidence
Connect an agent via an official MCP server G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 3 | full | 7/10 | Tprobed | |
Drive the product through a documented public API G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 3 | partial | 6/10 | Tprobed | |
Delegate tasks to a built-in AI assistant inside the product G Agentic features | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 3 | none | 0/10 | ||
Plug MCP servers into this product so it can use their tools G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 3 | n/a | 0/10 | ||
Point an agent at llms.txt or agent-oriented docs G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | full | 9/10 | Tprobed | |
Build against official SDKs G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | full | 8/10 | Tprobed | |
Use an official CLI G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | full | 7/10 | Cclaimed | |
Operate the product with natural-language commands G Agentic features | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | partial | 6/10 | Tprobed | |
Run the product headlessly / in CI for automation G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | partialfree | 6/10 | Cclaimed | |
Subscribe to events via webhooks G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | partial | 5/10 | Cclaimed | |
Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the product G Agentic features | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | partial | 4/10 | Cclaimed | |
Set up automations that run autonomously in the background G Agentic features | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | partial | 4/10 | Cclaimed | |
Download a machine-readable API spec (OpenAPI or equivalent) G Api quality | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | none | 0/10 | ||
Explore an interactive API reference with runnable examples G Api quality | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | none | 0/10 | ||
Rely on versioned APIs with a documented deprecation policy G Api quality | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | none | 0/10 | ||
Issue scoped/least-privilege API credentials for an agent G Agent access | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
Test against a sandbox environment without touching production data G Api quality | ai-native user | Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productAgenticness | 1 | partialfree | 4/10 | Cclaimed | |
Capture traces of my LLM calls with inputs, outputs, latency, and token usage C Trace capture | developer | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 3 | full | 9/10 | Xcommunity | |
See cost and token usage per request, model, and time period in dashboards C Cost tracking | developer | Cost monitoring — stories about cost monitoring in this arenaCost monitoring | 3 | full | 9/10 | Xcommunity | |
Self-host the core product G | ai-native user | Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpenness | 3 | full | 9/10 | Tprobed | |
Compare eval runs side by side to catch regressions between prompt or model versions C Offline evals | ml engineer | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 3 | full | 8/10 | Cclaimed | |
Curate datasets from production traces and run offline evaluations against them C Offline evals | ml engineer | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 3 | full | 8/10 | Cclaimed | |
Score outputs with configurable LLM-as-a-judge evaluators C Offline evals | ml engineer | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 3 | full | 8/10 | Cclaimed | |
Send and receive traces over OpenTelemetry (OTLP) instead of a proprietary format C Trace capture | developer | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 3 | full | 8/10 | Cclaimed | |
Version prompts and deploy changes to production without shipping code C Prompt workflow | developer | Prompt management — stories about prompt management in this arenaPrompt management | 3 | full | 8/10 | Xcommunity | |
Export all of my data in open formats and leave G | ai-native user | Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpenness | 3 | partial | 6/10 | Xcommunity | |
Have an agent query my traces, metrics, and eval results through an API or MCP server to debug my app C Ai observability | ai-native user | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 3 | partial | 6/10 | Tprobed | |
Define rules that trigger actions automatically on events G | ai-native user | Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depth | 3 | partial | 4/10 | Cclaimed | |
Prevent my data from being used to train AI models G | ai-native user | Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy posture | 3 | partial | 3/10 | Cclaimed | |
Build custom dashboards over latency, error, cost, and eval-score metrics C Monitoring | ml engineer | Alerting dashboards — stories about alerting dashboards in this arenaAlerting dashboards | 2 | full | 8/10 | Cclaimed | |
Bulk-export traces and datasets to blob storage or my data warehouse C Data export | developer | Data access export — stories about data access export in this arenaData access export | 2 | full | 8/10 | Xcommunity | |
Instrument apps in both Python and JS/TS with officially supported SDKs G Sdk coverage | developer | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 2 | full | 8/10 | Xcommunity | |
Read the product's source under an open license G | ai-native user | Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpenness | 2 | full | 8/10 | Tprobed | |
Route outputs to human annotation queues for review and labeling C Human review | ml engineer | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 2 | full | 8/10 | Cclaimed | |
Trace multi-step agent runs as nested spans grouped into sessions or threads C Trace capture | developer | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 2 | full | 8/10 | Xcommunity | |
Attribute cost and usage to users, sessions, and features via custom metadata C Cost tracking | developer | Cost monitoring — stories about cost monitoring in this arenaCost monitoring | 2 | full | 7/10 | Cclaimed | |
Have an agent create a dataset, trigger an eval run programmatically, and read back the results C Ai eval ops | ai-native user | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 2 | partial | 7/10 | Cclaimed | |
Instrument my app through existing integrations for frameworks like LangChain, the OpenAI SDK, or the Vercel AI SDK C Trace capture | developer | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 2 | full | 7/10 | Xcommunity | |
Iterate on prompts in a playground against real models and variables C Prompt workflow | developer | Prompt management — stories about prompt management in this arenaPrompt management | 2 | full | 7/10 | Xcommunity | |
Run evals in CI and gate deployments on their results C Offline evals | developer | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 2 | full | 7/10 | Cclaimed | |
Run evaluators continuously on live production traffic, not just offline datasets C Online evals | ml engineer | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 2 | full | 7/10 | Cclaimed | |
Write custom code-based scorers and metrics for my evaluations C Offline evals | ml engineer | Evals datasets — measuring quality — datasets, eval runs, regression trackingEvals datasets | 2 | full | 7/10 | Cclaimed | |
Do everything through the API that I can do in the UI G | ai-native user | Openness — open source, data portability, and self-hosting storiesOpenness | 2 | partial | 6/10 | Tprobed | |
Set alerts on error rates, cost spikes, or eval-score drops and get notified in Slack, PagerDuty, or email C Monitoring | developer | Alerting dashboards — stories about alerting dashboards in this arenaAlerting dashboards | 2 | partial | 6/10 | Cclaimed | |
Choose where my data is stored (region/residency) G | ai-native user | Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy posture | 2 | disputed | 5/10 | Dcontradicted | |
Perform bulk operations across many items at once G | ai-native user | Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depth | 2 | disputed | 5/10 | Dcontradicted | |
Control data retention and deletion G | ai-native user | Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy posture | 2 | partial | 3/10 | Xcommunity | |
Mask or redact sensitive data before it is stored in traces C Data controls | developer | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
Opt out of telemetry and usage tracking G | ai-native user | Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrivacy posture | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
Schedule recurring jobs or workflows G | ai-native user | Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depth | 2 | none | untested | none yet | |
Version, review, and roll back my automations G | ai-native user | Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedAutomation depth | 1 | partial | 6/10 | Cclaimed | |
Capture multimodal payloads (images, audio, files) inside my traces C Trace capture | developer | Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endTracing instrumentation | 1 | none | untested | none yet |
Opportunities — the stories that would move this product's scores, from its own judged verdictsOpportunitiestop 8 of 25 stories with headroom
What would move Langfuse’s scores — derived from its own judged verdicts, biggest headroom first. Each line quotes what the judge found missing; shipping it (or evidencing it publicly) is the fix.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productDelegate tasks to a built-in AI assistant inside the product
nonemoves Built-in AIimpact 45
Langfuse's evidence covers observability, prompt management, evaluation, MCP server connectivity, and self-hosting, but nothing describes a built-in AI assistant within the product itself that users can delegate tasks to; the MCP/docs-mcp features are for external coding agents integrating with Langfuse, not an assistant embedded in the Langfuse UI.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productIssue scoped/least-privilege API credentials for an agent
nonemoves agent-readyimpact 30
The evidence pack documents Langfuse's tracing, prompt management, evaluation, and API/export features, but contains no mention of API key scoping, role-based permissions, or least-privilege credential issuance for agents.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productExplore an interactive API reference with runnable examples
nonemoves API qualityimpact 30
Missing: any documentation or screenshot of an interactive API explorer, runnable code snippets in an API reference UI, or a working OpenAPI/Swagger spec.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productDownload a machine-readable API spec (OpenAPI or equivalent)
nonemoves API qualityimpact 30
While Langfuse's docs reference an API, SDKs, and a Metrics API v2, a direct probe for a machine-readable spec (openapi.json, swagger.json, etc.) returned 404 on all candidate paths, and no evidence pack item links to a downloadable OpenAPI/Swagger file.
Agenticness — how well agents can access and operate the productRely on versioned APIs with a documented deprecation policy
nonemoves API qualityimpact 30
Evidence shows an API exists (e.g., 'Metrics API v2') but there is no documentation of a versioning scheme or deprecation policy; the OpenAPI spec probe even returned 404s across candidate paths, suggesting no discoverable API spec/versioning docs.
Privacy posture — data-handling and privacy storiesPrevent my data from being used to train AI models
partialq3/10moves PA Scoreimpact 21
Missing: explicit data-usage/training policy, DPA or privacy documentation addressing model training, and independent confirmation of this stance for Langfuse Cloud users.
Automation depth — how much of the product can run unattendedSchedule recurring jobs or workflows
nonemoves PA Scoreimpact 20
Langfuse is an observability/evaluation platform for LLM apps; while it has scheduled exports and alerts, there is no evidence of user-defined recurring job/workflow scheduling (e.g., cron-like automation of arbitrary tasks) as an ai-native automation capability.
Tracing instrumentation — instrumenting code and tracing requests end to endMask or redact sensitive data before it is stored in traces
nonemoves PA Scoreimpact 20
No evidence in the pack mentions masking, redaction, or PII scrubbing before trace storage; the docs cover tracing, prompt management, evaluation, and deployment but not data masking capabilities.
Showing the top 8 of 25 — every none/partial verdict in the story verdicts table is headroom.
Think a verdict is wrong? Every verdicts-table row has a Flag link — see the methodology.
Coverage map — which docs area, API section, or community source covers which judged storiesCoverage map6 surfaces · 42 covered stories
Where the cited evidence behind each covered verdict came from — the same citations the verdicts table shows, no extra judging.
docs38 stories
- Point an agent at llms.txt or agent-oriented docs
- Run the product headlessly / in CI for automation
- Connect an agent via an official MCP server
- Use an official CLI
- Drive the product through a documented public API
- Build against official SDKs
- Subscribe to events via webhooks
- Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the product
- Set up automations that run autonomously in the background
- Operate the product with natural-language commands
- Test against a sandbox environment without touching production data
- Build custom dashboards over latency, error, cost, and eval-score metrics
- Set alerts on error rates, cost spikes, or eval-score drops and get notified in Slack, PagerDuty, or email
- Perform bulk operations across many items at once
- Define rules that trigger actions automatically on events
- Version, review, and roll back my automations
- Attribute cost and usage to users, sessions, and features via custom metadata
- See cost and token usage per request, model, and time period in dashboards
- Bulk-export traces and datasets to blob storage or my data warehouse
- Have an agent create a dataset, trigger an eval run programmatically, and read back the results
- Route outputs to human annotation queues for review and labeling
- Run evals in CI and gate deployments on their results
- Write custom code-based scorers and metrics for my evaluations
- Compare eval runs side by side to catch regressions between prompt or model versions
- Score outputs with configurable LLM-as-a-judge evaluators
- Curate datasets from production traces and run offline evaluations against them
- Run evaluators continuously on live production traffic, not just offline datasets
- Do everything through the API that I can do in the UI
- Export all of my data in open formats and leave
- Read the product's source under an open license
- Iterate on prompts in a playground against real models and variables
- Version prompts and deploy changes to production without shipping code
- Have an agent query my traces, metrics, and eval results through an API or MCP server to debug my app
- Instrument apps in both Python and JS/TS with officially supported SDKs
- Trace multi-step agent runs as nested spans grouped into sessions or threads
- Instrument my app through existing integrations for frameworks like LangChain, the OpenAI SDK, or the Vercel AI SDK
- Send and receive traces over OpenTelemetry (OTLP) instead of a proprietary format
- Capture traces of my LLM calls with inputs, outputs, latency, and token usage
Hacker News18 stories
- Drive the product through a documented public API
- Build against official SDKs
- Perform bulk operations across many items at once
- See cost and token usage per request, model, and time period in dashboards
- Bulk-export traces and datasets to blob storage or my data warehouse
- Do everything through the API that I can do in the UI
- Export all of my data in open formats and leave
- Read the product's source under an open license
- Self-host the core product
- Choose where my data is stored (region/residency)
- Control data retention and deletion
- Iterate on prompts in a playground against real models and variables
- Version prompts and deploy changes to production without shipping code
- Have an agent query my traces, metrics, and eval results through an API or MCP server to debug my app
- Instrument apps in both Python and JS/TS with officially supported SDKs
- Trace multi-step agent runs as nested spans grouped into sessions or threads
- Instrument my app through existing integrations for frameworks like LangChain, the OpenAI SDK, or the Vercel AI SDK
- Capture traces of my LLM calls with inputs, outputs, latency, and token usage
Self hosting docs8 stories
- Run the product headlessly / in CI for automation
- Test against a sandbox environment without touching production data
- Export all of my data in open formats and leave
- Read the product's source under an open license
- Self-host the core product
- Choose where my data is stored (region/residency)
- Prevent my data from being used to train AI models
- Control data retention and deletion
llms.txt3 stories
OpenAPI spec3 stories
Claims vs evidence — vendor claims reconciled against independent verdictsClaims vs evidence
14 of 26 testable claims verified · 0 contradicted → integrity 54/100
36 distinct capability claims found in Langfuse’s own claimed-docs/GitHub materials, reconciled against our judge’s independent verdicts.
14
Verified
12
Unverified
0
Contradicted
14
Undersold
Verified (24)
“Traces capture all LLM and non-LLM calls including retrieval, embeddings, and API calls”
Capture traces of my LLM calls with inputs, outputs, latency, and token usagefullproof ↗
“Supports tracking multi-turn conversations as sessions and per-user tracking”
Trace multi-step agent runs as nested spans grouped into sessions or threadsfullproof ↗
“Visualizes LLM agent workflows as a graph showing flow of complex agentic steps”
Trace multi-step agent runs as nested spans grouped into sessions or threadsfullproof ↗
“Captures traces via native Python/JS SDKs, 100+ framework integrations, OpenTelemetry, or an LLM gateway like LiteLLM”
Instrument apps in both Python and JS/TS with officially supported SDKsfullproof ↗
“Captures traces via native Python/JS SDKs, 100+ framework integrations, OpenTelemetry, or an LLM gateway like LiteLLM”
Instrument my app through existing integrations for frameworks like LangChain, the OpenAI SDK, or the Vercel AI SDKfullproof ↗
“Non-technical team members can edit prompts directly in the UI while the app fetches the latest version automatically”
Version prompts and deploy changes to production without shipping codefullproof ↗
“Prompts can be tested interactively in a built-in LLM Playground”
Iterate on prompts in a playground against real models and variablesfullproof ↗
“Prompts can be linked to traces to analyze performance by prompt version”
Version prompts and deploy changes to production without shipping codefullproof ↗
“Version control and labels let teams manage prompt deployments across environments”
Version prompts and deploy changes to production without shipping codefullproof ↗
“Large volumes of data can be exported to blob storage on a schedule”
Bulk-export traces and datasets to blob storage or my data warehousefullproof ↗
“A Metrics API v2 lets users query aggregate cost, usage, latency, volume, or score metrics”
Drive the product through a documented public APIpartialproof ↗
“Langfuse is open source and can be self-hosted via Docker”
“Langfuse is open source and can be self-hosted via Docker”
“Cost tracking works out of the box with built-in pricing for popular models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google”
See cost and token usage per request, model, and time period in dashboardsfullproof ↗
“Prompt management adds no latency because prompts are cached client-side by the SDK”
Version prompts and deploy changes to production without shipping codefullproof ↗
“Self-hosting runs the same infrastructure that powers Langfuse Cloud”
“Production-scale self-hosting supported via Kubernetes (Helm), AWS/Azure/GCP Terraform modules”
“Custom dashboards can be created to monitor cost across models, tags, or users”
See cost and token usage per request, model, and time period in dashboardsfullproof ↗
“Most integrations automatically capture usage and cost using built-in model pricing”
See cost and token usage per request, model, and time period in dashboardsfullproof ↗
“An MCP Server lets AI tools that can't run shell commands connect to Langfuse”
“An MCP Server lets AI tools that can't run shell commands connect to Langfuse”
Have an agent query my traces, metrics, and eval results through an API or MCP server to debug my apppartialproof ↗
“The API can be queried from Python or JS/TS SDKs”
“The API can be queried from Python or JS/TS SDKs”
Instrument apps in both Python and JS/TS with officially supported SDKsfullproof ↗
“Can run on a VM or locally via Docker Compose for testing and low-scale deployments”
Unverified (20)
“Alerts can notify via Slack, GitHub Actions, or Webhooks when a metric crosses a threshold”
Set alerts on error rates, cost spikes, or eval-score drops and get notified in Slack, PagerDuty, or emailpartialproof ↗
“Captures traces via native Python/JS SDKs, 100+ framework integrations, OpenTelemetry, or an LLM gateway like LiteLLM”
Send and receive traces over OpenTelemetry (OTLP) instead of a proprietary formatfullproof ↗
“Experiments can be run against datasets to test new prompt versions within Langfuse”
Curate datasets from production traces and run offline evaluations against themfullproof ↗
“Experiments can be run against datasets to test new prompt versions within Langfuse”
Compare eval runs side by side to catch regressions between prompt or model versionsfullproof ↗
“Supports LLM-as-a-Judge evaluation, using an LLM to assess another LLM's outputs”
Score outputs with configurable LLM-as-a-judge evaluatorsfullproof ↗
“Prompt, model, or code changes can be compared side by side via UI or SDK experiments”
Compare eval runs side by side to catch regressions between prompt or model versionsfullproof ↗
“CI/CD experiments can block deploys on regressions”
Run evals in CI and gate deployments on their resultsfullproof ↗
“A Metrics API v2 lets users query aggregate cost, usage, latency, volume, or score metrics”
Build custom dashboards over latency, error, cost, and eval-score metricsfullproof ↗
“Traces can be received via an OpenTelemetry (OTLP) endpoint”
Send and receive traces over OpenTelemetry (OTLP) instead of a proprietary formatfullproof ↗
“Custom code-based deterministic evaluators can be run”
Write custom code-based scorers and metrics for my evaluationsfullproof ↗
“Traces can be manually reviewed and rated via annotation queues and UI scoring”
Route outputs to human annotation queues for review and labelingfullproof ↗
“Reusable test-case sets can be built as Datasets”
Curate datasets from production traces and run offline evaluations against themfullproof ↗
“A CLI allows working with Langfuse from a terminal or coding agent”
“Custom dashboards can be created to monitor cost across models, tags, or users”
Build custom dashboards over latency, error, cost, and eval-score metricsfullproof ↗
“Most integrations automatically capture usage and cost using built-in model pricing”
Attribute cost and usage to users, sessions, and features via custom metadatafullproof ↗
“Custom dashboards can analyze cost, latency, volume, and quality”
Build custom dashboards over latency, error, cost, and eval-score metricsfullproof ↗
“Live production traces can be automatically scored via LLM-as-a-Judge or Scores API/SDK”
Run evaluators continuously on live production traffic, not just offline datasetsfullproof ↗
“Scores can be numeric, categorical, or boolean”
Score outputs with configurable LLM-as-a-judge evaluatorsfullproof ↗
“Scores can be numeric, categorical, or boolean”
Write custom code-based scorers and metrics for my evaluationsfullproof ↗
“Alerts can be set to notify automatically when spend crosses a threshold”
Set alerts on error rates, cost spikes, or eval-score drops and get notified in Slack, PagerDuty, or emailpartialproof ↗
Undersold (14)
Point an agent at llms.txt or agent-oriented docsfullproof ↗
Run the product headlessly / in CI for automationpartialproof ↗
Get AI-generated insights and suggestions from my data inside the productpartialproof ↗
Set up automations that run autonomously in the backgroundpartialproof ↗
Operate the product with natural-language commandspartialproof ↗
Test against a sandbox environment without touching production datapartialproof ↗
Define rules that trigger actions automatically on eventspartialproof ↗
Have an agent create a dataset, trigger an eval run programmatically, and read back the resultspartialproof ↗
Do everything through the API that I can do in the UIpartialproof ↗
Export all of my data in open formats and leavepartialproof ↗
Prevent my data from being used to train AI modelspartialproof ↗
Claims outside our story set (2)
Real capability claims found in Langfuse’s own materials, but no story in this arena’s taxonomy covers them yet — that’s feedback on the taxonomy, not a mark against the product.
“AI coding agents like Cursor can automatically integrate Langfuse tracing into a codebase”
source ↗“End-user feedback can be collected via User Feedback feature”
source ↗
Business model
MIT-licensed core you can self-host free; Langfuse Cloud has a free Hobby tier, then flat monthly Core/Pro plans with usage-based unit ingestion, and custom enterprise plans.
pricing ↗Score trend
How this product’s scores have moved as evidence and verdicts are re-derived — a point per change, not per day.
Flag
⚑ Flag a verdictThink a verdict is wrong? Opens a prefilled GitHub issue — or use the ⚑ next to any verdict above.
For agents
Agent surface uptime llms.txt 100% (30d, checked every 6h since Sep 8 '26)
