Alternatives

Alternatives to Cekura

7 LLM Evals & Observability rivals, ranked by the same evidence-graded leaderboard — Cekura itself ranks #2 with a PA Score of 36/100. Every “beats Cekura on” below comes from a judged head-to-head round with cited evidence — see the methodology.

#1
Braintrust
Braintrust Data, Inc.
PA Score 38/100vs Cekura →
coverage
43.8/100
Beats Cekura on: Delegate tasks to a built-in AI assistant inside the product · Curate datasets from production traces and run offline evaluations against them
#3
W&B Weave
Weights & Biases (CoreWeave)
PA Score 35/100vs Cekura →
coverage
41.8/100
Beats Cekura on: See cost and token usage per request, model, and time period in dashboards · Capture traces of my LLM calls with inputs, outputs, latency, and token usage
#4
Helicone
Helicone, Inc.
PA Score 34/100vs Cekura →
coverage
32.4/100
Beats Cekura on: Capture traces of my LLM calls with inputs, outputs, latency, and token usage · Trace multi-step agent runs as nested spans grouped into sessions or threads
#5
Langfuse
Langfuse GmbH
PA Score 34/100vs Cekura →
coverage
49.4/100
Beats Cekura on: See cost and token usage per request, model, and time period in dashboards · Self-host the core product
#6
Arize Phoenix
Arize AI, Inc.
PA Score 32/100vs Cekura →
coverage
43.5/100
Beats Cekura on: Self-host the core product · Send and receive traces over OpenTelemetry (OTLP) instead of a proprietary format
#7
LangSmith
LangChain, Inc.
PA Score 23/100vs Cekura →
coverage
38.6/100
Beats Cekura on: See cost and token usage per request, model, and time period in dashboards · Send and receive traces over OpenTelemetry (OTLP) instead of a proprietary format
#8
Galileo
Galileo
PA Score 19/100vs Cekura →
coverage
24.8/100
Beats Cekura on: Trace multi-step agent runs as nested spans grouped into sessions or threads · Curate datasets from production traces and run offline evaluations against them

Full leaderboard: LLM Evals & Observability arena →